[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@MajorianBTC Avatar @MajorianBTC Majorian

Majorian posts on X about bitcoin, money, has been, decentralized the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.

Engagements: XXXXX #

Engagements Line Chart

Mentions: XX #

Mentions Line Chart

Followers: XXXXX #

Followers Line Chart

CreatorRank: XXXXXXX #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence #

Social category influence cryptocurrencies finance stocks technology brands

Social topic influence bitcoin #3027, money, has been, decentralized #1859, filters, ethereum, transactions, ordinals #212, exchanges, $naka

Top assets mentioned Bitcoin (BTC) Ethereum (ETH) Nakamoto Games (NAKA)

Top Social Posts #

Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"Will exchanges wallet providers miners etc. publicly signal that they are not upgrading to Core v30"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-09T15:03Z XXX followers, 1812 engagements

"Being lectured about op_return by folks involved in this $NAKA stuff is laughable"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-10T20:40Z XXX followers, 1427 engagements

"Toxic bitcoin maximalism was created as a defense mechanism against shitcoinery with the aim to protect people from getting rekt. It has laid dormant during the bull market but the combination of Core v30 and the recent market crash has created a new class of maxi's"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-12T19:54Z XXX followers, 1847 engagements

"If we don't soft fork and neuter/eliminate op_return at the consensus level v30 will have represented a dramatic shift for bitcoin. A watershed moment when bitcoin maximalism died and the shitcoiners took control of the bitcoin network. It's not over yet though"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-13T20:39Z XXX followers, 7658 engagements

"We essentially have sold out bitcoin to Citrea for thirty pieces of silver. We must act"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-17T21:31Z XXX followers, 10.3K engagements

"Has bitcoin development gone the way of our modern politics where lobbyists can influence changes If you are a shitcoin protocol that needs something changed in bitcoin to benefit your shitcoin all you need to do is 'donate' to the right people"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-18T15:38Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"We need a soft fork to neuter op_return once and for all and it looks increasingly likely that will come in the form of a UASF. I do not trust Core right now to act in good faith during a soft fork review. You already see resistance to it on the mailing list"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-18T15:51Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"It is understandable to choose to not upgrade but at this point if you are a bitcoin maximalist you should consider running Knots. If we are going to reverse course from the dangerous path bitcoin is on we must take action"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-18T16:02Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"Knots is the client for bitcoin maximalists and Ocean is the mining pool of choice for bitcoin maximalists"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-18T17:01Z XXX followers, 1093 engagements

"The last few weeks have felt like a major vibe shift in bitcoin. People are coming to the light amd seeing v30 for the abomination that it is"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-18T18:39Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"@kyletorpey It just leaves a bad taste in your mouth when v30 is released and immediately shitcoin token protocols start celebrating"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-18T19:32Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"This is not a critique against Kyle but this is an important argument to discuss. The market chose bitcoin as superior to Ethereum long ago bitcoin's market cap is XXX% larger. Why Bitcoin is boring and not a fancy 'world computer' like Ethereum. Bitcoin is money"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-18T20:06Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"Toxic maximalism is the immune system of bitcoin. Sometimes it can get a bit over the top sure but ultimately maximalism is the reason bitcoin is winning"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-18T20:30Z XXX followers, 1912 engagements

"My rough draft proposal essentially nullifies the contentious changes in v30 at the consensus level and returns us back to the status quo which likely has wide approval. We set the spam debate to the side to ensure that we eliminate a threat vector from bitcoin"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-18T20:44Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"This seeks to be a compromise and 'bridge' solution for both sides. It feels like both the pro-Core and the pro-Knots folks agree that an avenue for malicious content is bad for bitcoin no matter your view on spam. Let's patch this up and then we can debate spam again"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-18T20:49Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"@utxoshit The longer clip does not materially change the substance of the argument"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-19T01:03Z XXX followers, XX engagements

""Large op_return transactions have always been possible with Slipstream." Do we really think miners weren't screening the content of those transactions It would be a huge liability for them not to. That is the issue with Core v30 introduces content moderation to bitcoin"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-19T02:37Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"Bitcoin as a monetary network is virtually censorship-proof and permissionless. Even still is already a target of regulatory persecution. Why on earth would we then add the perils of unrestricted p2p file storage to that Bitcoiners far less to defend this element too"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-19T02:39Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"Content moderation is a centralizing force in the internet age. Introducing it to bitcoin is a terrible idea but v30 opens the door to it"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-19T02:40Z XXX followers, XX engagements

""You're a statist you are pro-censorship you are not a true advocate of decentralized networks." Dude I would go to the gulag for bitcoin the money. I will not do that for your non-monetary bullshit. I'm not alone in this opinion either"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-19T02:43Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"Trump's election like it or not was a watershed moment for bitcoin in an immensely positive way. What did we do with it Spent a year bloviating about treasury companies and introducing the most controversial version of Core to bitcoin ever. We need to get our shit together"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-19T02:49Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"2025 is good for bitcoin because we need to ensure consensus and policy is as ironclad as possible and decentralize the client implementations and mining. Core was too centralized. Attacking Knots is silly more people are running nodes now and are still in consensus"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-19T02:53Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"Bitcoin has not faced a regime who means business about coming for it at least in the U.S. We have it easy right now but the current debate will make bitcoin stronger against future attacks. A diversity of nodes and clients that remain in consensus in large numbers is good"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-19T02:55Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"If anything op_return should be fixed so people have zero doubts about running a node. The node network is the most important part of bitcoin's security. Don't let anyone gaslight you about that"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-19T02:59Z XXX followers, 1164 engagements

"More people than ever are running nodes doing their research on consensus & policy rules following the dev mailing list etc. Core no longer has a monopoly on client implementation. This is all good for bitcoin"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-19T03:08Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

""We need to change bitcoin to attract companies to build things on top of bitcoin or else Ethereum will pass us by" is erroneous and ill-informed thinking. Bitcoin is winning because it is simple boring and superior hard money. There is nothing to change"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-19T04:40Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"@notgrubles The two are not even remotely cut from the same cloth. I'm XXX% anti-censorship of any monetary transaction on bitcoin. I am not for unsolicited non-monetary data someone is trying to get me to store and relay. You cannot equate the two"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-19T15:18Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"No matter how you slice it Core v30 is the implementation of choice by shitcoiners. Now we must ask ourselves are we going to let shitcoiners call the shots in bitcoin now"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-19T18:28Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"Is 2025 like 1054 for bitcoin is this our Great Schism We are in uncharted territory for bitcoin as there are two large competing camps that have no interest in forking off. Is this tenable long term Does the network converge on one client naturally That is the question"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-20T15:53Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@nakadai_mon When reference node client has nearly XXX% deployment relay policy is actually very effective and easier to utilize than consensus changes. Those days for now seem to be over. At one time filters were effective but a better term for them is relay policy"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-20T16:55Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"'Filters' are just a term for node relay policy which has been utilized by Core successfully for more than a decade as Core had nearly XXX% deployment as the reference client. This idea that 'filters' don't work has been disproven many times. They 'did' work but can't now"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-20T16:59Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"Bitcoin's uptime is part of its value proposition evident on a day like today"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-20T18:45Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"Capping op_return at the consensus level while yes some L2's will be affected is far less 'harmful' for future needs than anything to do with monetary scripts. Less likely to break things and we have been fine for a decade with low op_return tx's"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-20T20:22Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"Capping op_return at the protocol level gives the 'spam-agnostic' camp something they want and the 'anti-spam' camp something they want from a compromise perspective. Ordinals inscriptions etc. are untouched while non-arbitrary data is limited to a longstanding limit"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-20T20:31Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"If a significant portion of your wealth is in bitcoin and/or if you have a family to support you take bitcoin very seriously. You are not going to want there to be a bunch of controversial extra stuff going on which is why v30 has been so poorly-received"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-20T20:49Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"Bitcoin has been just fine for a decade with op_return de facto restricted to XX bytes. There should not be much controversy to enforce this limit at the protocol level. This seems like the only way we are going to bridge any gaps between the two sides"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-20T20:55Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"If you are in favor of returning bitcoin to where we were before the controversial v30 update consider spreading the word about my informal proposal:"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-20T21:08Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"Knots nodes are nearly a quarter of the bitcoin network. Truly unprecedented progress in the span of just a few months. This momentum stems from the success of Ocean Mining which uses Knots as its default client as well as backlash to the unpopular Bitcoin Core v30 update"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-17T15:45Z 1002 followers, 9934 engagements

"The attacks on Luke that accused him of whipping people up into a frenzy for the benefit of Ocean and Knots while there was a clear conflict of interest at Core with Citrea is unbelievable"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-19T15:14Z 1000 followers, 3239 engagements

"@notgrubles The exploit was virtually impossible until v30"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-20T02:40Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"300kb blocks would solve many of the issues we face today regarding spam in bitcoin and forces L2 to innovate"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-20T02:56Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"Layer X should be as ironclad as possible to enshrine bitcoin as superior hard money. Near-ossification would solve many problems we currently squabble over. Layer X is where tinkering should be done"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-20T03:19Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"It should be difficult to do transactions on Layer X that are more complex than just sending a set amount of bitcoin to an address. Complex transactions are what Layer X is for. Layer X must be a simple rock solid settlement layer"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-20T15:21Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"Why run Knots if technically Knots' 'filters' don't stop certain transactions from propagating XXX% of the time It is a philosophical signal to voice displeasure in what Core is doing and also allows one to choose not to voluntarily participate in what v30 allows"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-20T17:00Z 1002 followers, 1471 engagements

"@xst_block I don't think many people running either implementation are running virtual nodes"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-20T19:52Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"It feels like the best thing for bitcoin is a soft fork addressing op_return. Set the spam argument to the side fix this point of contention. If a very low % of the network chooses to run v30 seems to validate the thesis that there is support for a low op_return limit"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-20T20:14Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"It is clear by Knots adoption that Core increasing the op_return relay limit (or unbounding it to put it another way) is not universally accepted as legitimate. Let's put it to the test then in a 'clean' BIP"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-20T20:23Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"@notgrubles It won't die. Hard to say anything can fully 'kill' bitcoin. The argument is avoiding unnecessary harm to bitcoin. Self-inflicted wounds"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-20T20:37Z 1002 followers, XXX engagements

"I didn't get into bitcoin to join some libertarian crusade against internet censorship. I use bitcoin for money. That's why op_return is so controversial it is a specific conduit in bitcoin for non-money stuff. This data field should be very small to avoid abuse"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-20T20:43Z 1002 followers, 1282 engagements

"Fixing op_return does not solve the spam debate in bitcoin in fact it returns us to square one. I think many of us crave to be back at square one than where we are today"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-20T20:59Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"A soft fork is also a non-ideological solution. It's simple: just wind the clock back to where bitcoin was in September and had been for a decade. That's it. No commentary on spam ordinals inscriptions knots censorship the state etc. A compromise"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-20T21:48Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"If Core continues to ignore the reality that v30 is unpopular you will have the supermajority of the network running older versions of Core alongside a derivative of Core in Bitcoin Knots. How long that will persist remains to be seen"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-21T18:44Z 1002 followers, XXX engagements

"If you don't like the changes Core v30 introduced and are seeking to upgrade from an End of Life version of Core Bitcoin Knots is really the only choice you have right now"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-21T18:47Z 1002 followers, XXX engagements

"Knots is fully-open source. Anyone in theory can audit the code and make beneficial suggestions"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-21T18:55Z 1002 followers, XXX engagements

"The only way to fully prevent Core v30 from doing harm to the network is a soft fork that permanently lowers the op_return limit to XX bytes or less at the consensus level. v30 will continue to act as a derivative of Libre Relay"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-21T18:59Z 1002 followers, XXX engagements

"@GoldLeader89 Gives one plausible deniability which you don't have with Core v30"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-21T20:31Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"What is fascinating is that although Core has been the reference implementation of bitcoin for many years all it took was one instance of not listening to the user base and Core went from XX% market share to now closing in on XX% and falling. Bitcoin is decentralized"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-21T18:49Z 1002 followers, XXX engagements

"What's amusing is that Core is just business as usual. "Lost XX% of our user base That is fine surely the anti-v30 camp is in the minority. We know better." Heads buried in the sand"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-21T18:52Z 1002 followers, 1578 engagements

"What we have seen time and time again over the years in bitcoin is that if individuals or organizations become infected with shitcoinery they eventually lose their influence over the bitcoin network. Bitcoin has a robust immune system that deters shitcoining"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-21T19:01Z 1002 followers, XXX engagements

"Many bitcoiners have shitcoined at one time of another and this journey is common on the road to becoming a bitcoin maximalist. I am not trusting of those who persist in shitcoining even after seeing how damaging it can be"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-21T19:28Z 1002 followers, XXX engagements

"That the pro-shitcoin wing of bitcoin was able to ram thru a major update to Core should be a wake up call to all bitcoiners"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-21T19:33Z 1002 followers, 1335 engagements

"@crypto_padre XX% (to be precise but growing) is a gigantic minority in a decentralized system like bitcoin. Soft forks require 90%-95% adoption. So as a thought experiment imagine 100000 byte op_return as a soft fork it would not pass. I understand consensus in theory already allows 1MB"
X Link @MajorianBTC 2025-10-22T01:14Z 1002 followers, XXX engagements