[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@GloveAcademia Avatar @GloveAcademia Glove Academia.base

Glove Academia.base posts on X about if you, chad, hidden, clavicular the most. They currently have XXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXX engagements in the last XX hours.

Engagements: XXX #

Engagements Line Chart

Mentions: XX #

Mentions Line Chart

Followers: XXX #

Followers Line Chart

CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence

Social category influence technology brands XXXX% countries XXXX%

Social topic influence if you 7.69%, chad 3.85%, hidden 3.85%, clavicular 3.85%, oo 3.85%, mega 3.85%, origin of 3.85%, believe in 3.85%, history 3.85%, nick fuentes XXXX%

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @philoxenuss @duplexcity01 @orthobrohenok @scriptoriump @jayd007 @talonthepapist @orthobro_henok @fuentesupdates @clippedszn @catholicizm1 @poperespecter1 @jakerattlesnk @wordwardebate @mljhaynes @pelicancatholic @usuallypregnant @yarilogos @how2bechristian @redeemedzoomer @orthopepe1

Top Social Posts

Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"@FuentesUpdates Jay Dyer: Nick is compromised by the ghey globo homo Vatican. Vatican X More like Vatican Jew. Groypers: ANKLE BITING NICK DIDNT GET THE CALL Jay Dyer warned the groypers. Time and time again hes been shown to be correct about Nick Fuentes(tein)"
X Link 2025-12-11T15:09Z XXX followers, 1560 engagements

"Clavicular is proof that XX% of dudes are htn to chad lite hidden under bad habits and fat. It also proves too many women are liars and if youre attractive you can say the most outrageous stuff and women will follow along"
X Link 2025-12-03T19:32Z XXX followers, 1955 engagements

"EO: X signifies distinction. OO: isnt the soul different from the body If you were consistent youd say X natures not X EO: does from X signify theoretically divided parts OO: yes EO: but cant you theoretically divide the body from the soul into X parts OO:"
X Link 2025-12-07T11:13Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"@usuallypregnant I want mega knight to be nerfed"
X Link 2025-12-11T07:36Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"@YariLogos Its not natural theology because the very things themselves like telos are principled by the Logoi. God is revealed in all of creation since all things created including the words of scripture were based on the Logoi"
X Link 2025-12-11T08:58Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"Natural theology in its proper understanding reflects how creation constantly attests to Gods existence. But to use these as proofs would assume telos itself is already proven but the only way to justify telos is God since God is the origin of telos. To believe in telos at all is to already assume God"
X Link 2025-12-11T09:02Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"Wow. Once again @Jay_D007 vindicated on face lords. Vatican 2=Vatican Jew. Nick is compromised and groyper fuentcucks are walking right into the most abominable honeypot in recorded history"
X Link 2025-12-11T15:11Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"@How2BeChristian @redeemed_zoomer Where is redeemed zoomer in scripture"
X Link 2025-12-11T15:25Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"True the distinction is real and if you read the minutes of Chalcedon its extremely clear that X signifies distinction. They insist on X because they want to signify the distinction between the natures just as the persons are X yet inseparable due to mutual interpenetration for the Son dwells in the Father. For Christ indeed is one perfect both in divinity and in humanity. For it is not the nature of number to cause separation or unity but its nature is to indicate the quantity of what is enumerated whether these are united or separated: for we have unity for instance when fifty stones"
X Link 2025-12-13T10:35Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@PhiloxenusS @Orthobro_Henok @ScriptoriumP So thats not actually a substantive argument because distinction en theoria is correct but division into X is not. We recognize the union but the enumeration in Chalcedonian thought doesnt signify unity or division but rather the identity of a thing being what it is"
X Link 2025-12-13T19:53Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"So actually the entire debate lays on the position that everyone uses the same mode of counting. Thats obviously false as mentioned above. When a Chalcedonian counts it may or may not signify the same thing as when you count. The implicit assumption here is that you think we think counting=division but it is not"
X Link 2025-12-13T19:57Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@Orthobro_Henok @PhiloxenusS @ScriptoriumP Exactly. He keeps assuming the X refers to the whole thing as if the whole thing differs from itself. No the constituent things the fire and iron and the soul and body and the divine nature and human nature differ. Christ is not a different person than Christ"
X Link 2025-12-13T20:24Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@PhiloxenusS @Orthobro_Henok @ScriptoriumP No because youre confusing natural energy with a different meaning of energy. Thats the same fallacy youve been using the entire time"
X Link 2025-12-13T20:30Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@PhiloxenusS @Orthobro_Henok @ScriptoriumP And in nature simply refers to the fact that Christ has X ousia"
X Link 2025-12-13T20:44Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"Another microneedling round. Shi has me X shot. Used peptides. Almost became clav"
X Link 2025-12-13T02:43Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"So again you keep running right into a wall. Will or sometimes called natural will isnt the same as other usages of will. Natural will signifies the type of ousia and just like ousia it is shared among everyone with that nature. All men share X natural will that doesnt mean were all united by hypostasis retard"
X Link 2025-12-14T13:19Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"So again this literally comes from straight up ignorance. Read Nyssa On Not X Gods. He explains why there is X man among all men. This same logic is also used for human willthere is invariance and unity in kind. Though each man is divided from another they are still called X man as Nyssa says. Though each man wills separately from another they still share X natural will. That is just reflexivity"
X Link 2025-12-14T13:22Z XXX followers, XX engagements