[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@DrocDolf Avatar @DrocDolf DrocDolf

DrocDolf posts on X about $qbts, $ionq, $rgti, $qubt the most. They currently have XXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.

Engagements: XXXXX #

Engagements Line Chart

Mentions: XX #

Mentions Line Chart

Followers: XXX #

Followers Line Chart

CreatorRank: XXXXXXX #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence #

Social category influence stocks finance technology brands

Social topic influence $qbts #45, $ionq #74, $rgti #77, $qubt #316, $qbtss #1, $10m #92, $05m #1, ibm #53, $btq, all the

Top assets mentioned D-Wave Quantum Inc. (QBTS) IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) Rigetti Computing, Inc. Common Stock (RGTI) Quantum Computing Inc. Common (QUBT) IBM (IBM)

Top Social Posts #

Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"$IONQ They do this all the time. The technical term is SCAM. This is actually how all shitcos bullshit their investors. $QBTS $QUBT $IONQ $BTQ $RGTI"
X Link @DrocDolf 2025-10-13T13:13Z XXX followers, 7097 engagements

"$IONQ Do you need more proof that they're full of shit just trying to scam you into financing this early-stage 10-30 year R&D project while insiders get super rich in the process and you lose all your money Apparently IonQ's "breakthrough" was already achieved in 2012 #Scam"
X Link @DrocDolf 2025-09-23T12:16Z XXX followers, 47.3K engagements

"@MtnYardSale @commonsenseplay @MartinShkreli Latecomers to the FOMO are obviously the dumbest and the ones who will lose the most. Same thing as in Ponzi schemes. The dumbest they become the closer we are to the collapse"
X Link @DrocDolf 2025-10-14T18:42Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"@andromeda_IX They're shorting $RGTI. But apparently they're only shorting that. Strange considering same arguments to justify RGTI short applies to other quantum shitcos. Their tactic is to try deviate attention to CCCX. In my opinion the whole quantum bubble will collapse at the same time"
X Link @DrocDolf 2025-10-12T13:39Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"I guess they'll hit the same laser roadblocks that forced $IONQ to restart from scratch with Oxford Ionics' 10-qubits"
X Link @DrocDolf 2025-10-12T12:23Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"$IONQ $QBTS $RGTI $QUBT Mathematician Zelmanov Fields medalist & cryptography expert: QC reminds me of a tale from an old Uzbek village: a man promised the king he would teach his donkey to talk in XX years for a good price. By then either the king or the donkey would be dead"
X Link @DrocDolf 2025-10-11T12:21Z XXX followers, 66.3K engagements

"@dwavequantum @comcast Not exactly super trustworthy. Comcast is known for their marketing bullshit just like D-Wave. But let us know the details of the results when the toy "trial" finishes for the laughs"
X Link @DrocDolf 2025-10-06T15:19Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"Peter Shor couldn't help but let out a charming chuckle. possibly reflecting inwardly on the thought of how ridiculous the excessive hype really is. His 1994 factoring algorithm is what put quantum computing on the map. $IONQ $RGTI $QBTS $QUBT"
X Link @DrocDolf 2025-10-09T16:25Z XXX followers, 4745 engagements

"@dwavequantum @FastCompany Curious business model of this marketing firm. Congrats to $QBTS on winning alongside the other 150200 companies that paid the $1000. Now you have credibility"
X Link @DrocDolf 2025-10-14T22:12Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"@Alan_Baratz The agreement lets them use $QBTS's QCaaS web access for $10M over five years. So $0.5M per quarter in QCaaS revenue. In other words business as usual nothing to see here. Except D-Wave is as always trying to present the agreement in a way that misleads investors"
X Link @DrocDolf 2025-10-15T14:03Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"The agreement lets them use $QBTS's QCaaS web access for $10M over five years. So $0.5M per quarter in QCaaS revenue. In other words business as usual nothing to see here. Except D-Wave is as always trying to present the agreement in a way that misleads investors"
X Link @DrocDolf 2025-10-15T14:04Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"$IONQ $RGTI $QBTS $QUBT This is Peter Shor September XX 2025. Minute 56: "probably several decades away""
X Link @DrocDolf 2025-10-07T13:13Z XXX followers, 152.6K engagements

"After reading Infleqtion's two recent papers: -Still in a very early R&D stage shooting in the dark like everyone else. -Rushing to ramp up their PR hype machine because of $CCCX. -Their roadmap is pure fantasy. -The Sept 2025 dumbed-down Shor demo is what IBM achieved in 2001"
X Link @DrocDolf 2025-10-12T12:23Z XXX followers, 2532 engagements

"HARD FACT: D-Wave cannot solve a single real-world problem for commercial customers any better than this free web service (which explains the trend of increasing operating losses $QBTS ⚰):"
X Link @DrocDolf 2025-10-07T22:35Z XXX followers, 52.3K engagements

"29/ $QBTS 🚨New paper DEBUNKS FRAUDULENT methodology: D-Wave's annealer recent claims & Kipu's☝sus BS advantage over classical. Typical trick: cherry-pick classical solvers problems & runtime definition. "A practical runtime advantage on current NISQ hardware remains elusive""
X Link @DrocDolf 2025-10-11T10:26Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"When these start signaling exhaustion: $QBTX (2 $QBTS) $IONX (2 $IONQ) $RGTX and $RGTU (2 $RGTI) $QUBX (2 $QUBT) We'll see a rotation into the next logical parabolic-growth 📈 plays: $QBTZ $IONZ and other upcoming inverse X ETFs. This time with a fact-based narrative"
X Link @DrocDolf 2025-10-07T20:50Z XXX followers, XXX engagements

"31/ 🚨NEW example of $QBTS' annealer proving useless & showing how corrupt science works Traffic optimization: Gurobi CRUSHES D-Wave's quantum solver & consistently beats their hybrid solver (possibly using OR-Tools under the hood) Yet they try to spin the truth See abstract👇"
X Link @DrocDolf 2025-10-15T13:41Z XXX followers, XX engagements

"@xDeeez Wishful thinking. Implementing Shor algorithm on a real quantum computer is old news: "In 2001 Shor's algorithm was demonstrated by a group at IBM who factored XX into XX using a quantum computer with X qubits" Doing it beyond classical capability is a whole different story"
X Link @DrocDolf 2025-10-11T20:40Z XXX followers, 47.4K engagements