[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]

@Dr_Gonzo_K Avatar @Dr_Gonzo_K Gonzo.𐤊as

Gonzo.𐤊as posts on X about bitcoin, kaspa, hashrate, money the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XX posts still getting attention that total XXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.

Engagements: XXXXX #

Engagements Line Chart

Mentions: XX #

Mentions Line Chart

Followers: XXXXX #

Followers Line Chart

CreatorRank: XXXXXXXXX #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence

Social category influence cryptocurrencies XXXXX% finance XXXXX% exchanges XXXX% automotive brands XXXX% stocks XXXX%

Social topic influence bitcoin #2716, kaspa #282, hashrate #85, money 3.17%, if you 3.17%, binance 1.59%, exchanges 1.59%, fiat 1.59%, arcblock 1.59%, token XXXX%

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @thekaspaonion @worksofbitcoin @bitcoin_outlaw @rajatsoni @aastack @bitcoinoutlaw @oliverbiscuit69 @steaknshake @walletofsatoshi @navin757e @scavacini777 @00iamgru00 @12stringcara @grok @nikolagalilei @relaiapp @ghostofstacks @burke1dong @seb287 @cryptoodie

Top assets mentioned Bitcoin (BTC) Kaspa (KAS) Arcblock (ABT)

Top Social Posts

Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours

"This is basically how I feel about the whole Kaspa Binance drama. Exchanges are where you go to party. Pump n dump. Sell your fiat. Bet your savings. Some cryptos require them to justify their existence. Kaspa exists in spite of them"
X Link 2025-12-05T17:01Z 1619 followers, 3810 engagements

"If Bitcoin was perfect Kaspa wouldn't need to exist"
X Link 2025-12-06T22:21Z 1619 followers, 2096 engagements

"@thekaspaonion @Ed_L_P @worksofbitcoin @AAStack Always love an excuse to share this"
X Link 2025-12-13T06:40Z 1619 followers, 1696 engagements

"@Bitcoin_Outlaw @OliverBiscuit69 @Rajatsoni @SteaknShake @walletofsatoshi Is Arcblock ethwe rejn What about pepe Lightning is a layer built on bitcoin"
X Link 2025-12-13T22:19Z 1619 followers, XX engagements

"@Bitcoin_Outlaw @00iamgru00 @OliverBiscuit69 @Rajatsoni @SteaknShake @walletofsatoshi Receipts. You're swapping receipts right up until the closing when the bitcoin gets unlocked and the utxo for what you are owed is deposited back to you. There is no token"
X Link 2025-12-14T07:44Z 1619 followers, XX engagements

"@AAStack Funny all X of those have been replaced with superior tech. The wheel is no longer wood we've developed ways of harnessing fire in safer ways the computer fits in our pocket and Kaspa finished what Bitcoin started. The writing is on the wall AA. First does not equal final"
X Link 2025-12-02T14:54Z 1617 followers, 18.9K engagements

"@TheVladCostea Usable internet money you say. Sounds like Kaspa"
X Link 2025-12-10T07:13Z 1617 followers, XXX engagements

"@thekaspaleidy @TrendingBitcoin I actually see Bitcoin as the King on the chessboard. Without it the game doesn't exist. Kaspa is the queen. It moves in all directions and is undoubtedly the best piece on the board"
X Link 2025-12-10T18:23Z 1615 followers, XXX engagements

"@Scavacini777 About XX% of Bitcoiners care about price"
X Link 2025-12-11T18:05Z 1619 followers, XXX engagements

"Kaspa isnt a security for the same reason Bitcoin isnt: no issuer no fundraising no company no promoter no managerial team. Its a mined PoW commodity. Let's take a look shall we: X. Theres no issuer or sale: Nobody sold Kaspa to investors. No raise no company no foundation no promoter. PoW coins are produced not issued. If theres no issuer there is no investment contract. X. Kaspa has no company CEO treasury or organization your money is tied to. Open-source contributors arent an enterprise. This alone fails Howey. X. There is no profit expectation from a promotor. Holding a mined commodity"
X Link 2025-12-12T03:42Z 1617 followers, XXX engagements

"@thekaspaonion @Bitcoin_Teddy"
X Link 2025-12-12T07:22Z 1617 followers, XX engagements

"Thats very clever. It explains everything I need to know about your thesis. Im sure you win lots of arguments. But at least I'm not sucking Saylor off hoping people somehow fix the security budget. We'll just keep doing everything better than you while you yell shitcoin and literally nothing else. I actually hope Saylor says this one day. It'll go down as one of the best clips in Kaspa history. And we'll have another "Saylor got fucked" headline again"
X Link 2025-12-12T07:27Z 1617 followers, XXX engagements

"@SaintStreet714 @yhbryankimiq I'll just leave these here"
X Link 2025-12-12T23:23Z 1617 followers, XX engagements

"@CryptoOdie I agree. They're the ace in the sleeve. Never implied I want them to go. Kaspa isn't finished. Just that Kaspa doesn't continue to exist because of them alone"
X Link 2025-12-13T06:17Z 1617 followers, XX engagements

"@Rajatsoni I thought Bitcoiners wanted sovereign money. Why then do they rely on Lightning to transact and celebrate banks governments and ETFs taking control of it Does this make sense"
X Link 2025-12-13T18:43Z 1618 followers, XXX engagements

"You exchnge bitcoin for an IOU when you open a lightning channel. Bitcoin cant leave the base layer. Meaning whenever you send something on lightning it is not bitcoin being sent. Lightning has no bitcoin security (otherwise it'd have a hashrate) gives miners X fees and reintroduces trust into a trustless system. You haven't studied how lightning works"
X Link 2025-12-13T22:33Z 1620 followers, XX engagements

"You're confusing yourself by saying token. You're looking for another ticker symbol when there isn't one. Not every layer on a blockchain is required to have its own ticker. Lightning is a Layer X. If bitcoin were moving on lightning then a) it would have a hashrate b) you'd be able to withdraw it directly to cold storage and c) every trans a action you made on it would give fees to miners"
X Link 2025-12-13T22:40Z 1620 followers, XX engagements

"Re question #2: my question was whether lightning payments are secured by miners If it was it would have a hashrate surely Re question number 4: my question was whether a bitcoin payment on lightning is p2p if it involves me opening a channel sending funds transferring via lightning nodes or routing hubs and then closing a channel. If it were p2p surely it be me sending bitcoin to another wallet with none of these extra steps"
X Link 2025-12-13T23:06Z 1615 followers, XX engagements

"@grok @Bitcoin_Outlaw @OliverBiscuit69 @Rajatsoni @SteaknShake @walletofsatoshi P2p = me sending bitcoin to you directly. Sending via lightning and routing channels is not p2p. Lightning is not trustless as I have to trust that liquidity exists and channels remain open/online. Lightning is comprised of very few nodes with most all pooled together"
X Link 2025-12-13T23:34Z 1614 followers, XX engagements

"@grok @Bitcoin_Outlaw @OliverBiscuit69 @Rajatsoni @SteaknShake @walletofsatoshi But not p2p bitxoin"
X Link 2025-12-14T00:07Z 1617 followers, XX engagements

"@grok @Bitcoin_Outlaw @OliverBiscuit69 @Rajatsoni @SteaknShake @walletofsatoshi Correct. The base layer is p2p but given its tx times and throughput limits its not a viable medium of exchange. Hence the need for lightning. Yet by opening a lightning channel in order to send "bitcoin" over a L2 you immediately give up the p2p properties of bitcoin"
X Link 2025-12-14T00:14Z 1617 followers, XX engagements

"You're not following. If a transaction on lightning were Bitcoin then it would result in a fee being paid to the miners securing the network. This is only one of the hallmarks that demonstrate how LN is not bitcoin. Others would be LN not having a hash rate. Or why you can't withdraw directly to a cold storage wallet. If lightning were real Bitcoin it would behave like a bitcoin transaction. Bitcoin never leaves the base layer. And because of that overreliance on it as a way to scale bitcoin directly impacts Bitcoins security needs because it doesn't contribute fees"
X Link 2025-12-14T07:27Z 1618 followers, XX engagements

"What you described with lightning is not p2p. If I have to open a lightning channel fund it send via lightning off chain through hubs and routing channels and then settle by closing then I've done a lot more steps than p2p. P2p = me sending bitcoin to someone else with nothing else in the middle"
X Link 2025-12-13T23:21Z 1619 followers, XX engagements

"If I want to send you bitcoin via lightning then it is not p2p. You are saying it is p2p because one lightning channel sends lightning bitcoin to another lightning channel. P2p digital cash as defined in the whitepaper is me to you. Thats it. No routing. No offchain tx. If I leave the base layer to send . its not p2p. Onchain security is only present during channel opens and closes. Every tx inside lightning does not benefit from base layer security. And when you use it you don't support the security budget. If XXX tx occur inside lightning X tx hit the base layer (open/close). You're trading"
X Link 2025-12-14T00:48Z 1619 followers, XX engagements

"@grok @Bitcoin_Outlaw @OliverBiscuit69 @Rajatsoni @SteaknShake @walletofsatoshi Did the whitepaper describe scaling in layers Direct transfers means direct. If i route through a lightning channel I'm moving offchain introducing steps and trusting channels dont close. its no longer p2p"
X Link 2025-12-14T01:00Z 1619 followers, XX engagements

"@BitcoinPierre Don't remember that part of the whitepaper. What happened to the p2p medium of exchange function"
X Link 2025-12-14T03:11Z 1619 followers, XXX engagements

"And this will always be a barrier to global bitcoin adoption. If you want to get on the Bitcoin standard first you need to buy bitcoin then wait a whole bunch of time for it to get to your wallet then download a lightning wallet then learn how to open channels then how to transact on it how to close the channel what to do with balances what routing hubs are how watch towers function . the list is endless. Everyone celebrates square for making it easy . because it bypasses even the first step above. Buy Bitcoin. LN is such a deceptive tool"
X Link 2025-12-14T04:09Z 1619 followers, XX engagements

"If you don't understand why this is a problem and why miners need to receive fees then you dont understand proof of work or how bitcoin operates. In X halvings the block rewards isn't enough to sustain security needs so Bitcoin will need a fee market. Where are those fees going to come from if most tx are occurring off chain Lightning found a way to scale bitcoin usage. But it didnt find a way to make it beneficial for the base layer. And it didnt do it while maintaining decentralization or security. You give up both of those attributes on LN. At least Kaspa kept both when if scaled."
X Link 2025-12-14T15:49Z 1619 followers, XXX engagements