[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@CuriousMrFox101 Curious Mr. FoxCurious Mr. Fox posts on X about inflation, investment, maga, supreme court the most. They currently have XXXXX followers and XXX posts still getting attention that total XXXXXX engagements in the last XX hours.
Social category influence finance XXXX% stocks XXXX% technology brands XXXX% countries XXXX% celebrities XXXX%
Social topic influence inflation 2.34%, investment 1.87%, maga 1.4%, supreme court 1.4%, chaos 0.93%, instead of 0.93%, debt 0.93%, law enforcement 0.47%, has been 0.47%, shell XXXX%
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @grok @southernmsgurl @stephenm @thomassayre13 @kekate @msdisaffected @projectlincoln @poolguy702 @senschumer @boomerjeff @elonmusk @burtmand @landofconfused @calltoactivism @burtmand_ @festivus96 @halftangible @jeannie4peace @faithmerrill @ksorbs
Top assets mentioned JPMorgan Chase (JPM) Bank of America (BAC) Lazard Ltd. Class A (LAZ)
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"@grok @Poolguy702 @StephenM Crosby voided a state sanctions law that conflicted with federal foreign policy it regulated commerce; Illinoiss EO regulates nothing so obstacle preemption doesnt apply. Do you have another example"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T23:40Z 1046 followers, XX engagements
"@StephenM It's called Federalism. That's when the states are not forced to execute federal law"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T22:47Z 1045 followers, 17.8K engagements
"@TheDemocrats So many commenters not knowing that if Deal Maker in Chief wanted to make a deal he could. The Republicans control everything right now. What does that tell you"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T04:04Z 1045 followers, 17.8K engagements
"@grok @ThomasSayre13 @Boomerjeff @StephenM "Courts assess intent via program design and communications but evidentiary ties to individual causation remain key for conviction" What evidence is needed"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T06:50Z 1045 followers, XX engagements
"Without notice doesnt mean ICE broke a rule; it means locals had no heads-up when an operation hit. That sudden chaos can spill into schools homes or local law enforcement response. The EO just documents those ripple effects after the fact so the state isnt blind next time"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T18:20Z 1045 followers, XX engagements
"You can always tell when a man knows hes guilty. He starts pointing at someone else. Its the oldest trick: when the light swings your way shout about another sinner and hope the crowd turns their heads. But deflection doesnt cleanse the stain. What came from that Young Republicans chat wasnt a lapse of manners it was a glimpse of the rot thats been politely renamed patriotism. To speak of it as boys being boys is to forget what kind of boys they were: grown men rehearsing hate making cruelty sound like loyalty. You call that leadership No thats fear hiding behind a flag. And now instead of"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-16T21:02Z 1037 followers, 77.6K engagements
"@NancyMace Sorry but gender affirming care has been recognized by every major medical association in the country what youre describing isnt medicine its manners. Doctors use pronouns for the same reason they wash their hands: basic care not politics"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-21T19:11Z 1038 followers, XXX engagements
"@Mike_from_PA @OrganizerMemes What we need is Republican Susan Collins. She'll get that nasty Democrat usurper out of there postehaste. Then we can get back to normal"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-21T21:19Z 1037 followers, 2647 engagements
"@KariLake @OANN @ChanelRion I like the idea of reporters roaming around the Pentagon. Shows that the government has confidence in transparency. Or at least it should. For all you deep state enthusiasts you sure love creating deep states"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-21T22:40Z 1037 followers, 1275 engagements
"@SenAshleyMoody @POTUS @SenRickScott Are those fake teeth and a real face or a fake face with real teeth"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-21T23:37Z 1036 followers, XXX engagements
"@GovPressOffice Domestic Beef producers meanwhile in line for tariff-based bailout"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-22T03:26Z 1036 followers, 1296 engagements
"Graham Platner has repeatedly stated that he was unaware of the tattoo's association with Nazi symbolism when he got it. In a statement addressing the controversy he explained that he received the skull-and-crossbones design on his chest in 2007 (or 2009 per some accounts) while "very inebriated" as a young Marine and only learned of its historical ties to the SS Totenkopf unit years later. He also emphasized his lifelong commitment to antifascism including his activism against racism and far-right extremism"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-22T06:22Z 1040 followers, XXX engagements
"@JustineBateman And I bet you blame gavin newsom for it. LOLZ"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-22T16:37Z 1044 followers, XXX engagements
"@OrrRegina70505 @MAGAVoice MAGA absolutely hates gay people"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-22T18:29Z 1045 followers, XX engagements
"@ksorbs #MAGA hates the LGBTQ community. They are filled with rage and hate"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-22T18:33Z 1045 followers, XXX engagements
"@OrrRegina70505 @MAGAVoice There are MANY. it's all over this platform. MAGA hatred is a common theme"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-22T18:45Z 1045 followers, XX engagements
"@Priddy_Unusual @ksorbs Did MAGA convince you that vaccines are for drinking Yikes"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-22T19:28Z 1033 followers, XX engagements
"@southernmsgurl @grok @ke_kate @ms_disaffected @ProjectLincoln But it's nice to see someone on the right arguing for safety nets. We've come so far"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T15:08Z 1041 followers, XX engagements
"@southernmsgurl @grok @ke_kate @ms_disaffected @ProjectLincoln So the GOP should carve out away to keep the uninsured insured And no snap benefits will be affected. Easy"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T15:21Z 1041 followers, X engagements
"@southernmsgurl @grok @ke_kate @ms_disaffected @ProjectLincoln That's the problem. You have to replace you can't just soft repeal"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T15:23Z 1041 followers, XX engagements
"@southernmsgurl @grok @ke_kate @ms_disaffected @ProjectLincoln There is no phase out plan other than phasing it out. No plan to replace it. That is unacceptable. This is not about money. We are the richest country in the world by measures. This is about politics"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T15:39Z 1037 followers, XX engagements
"@southernmsgurl @grok @ke_kate @ms_disaffected @ProjectLincoln We can talk about that. First we need to end the shutdown by making sure the insured stay insured"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T16:34Z 1036 followers, XX engagements
"@southernmsgurl @grok @ke_kate @ms_disaffected @ProjectLincoln Ending the shutdown without premium hikes"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T16:35Z 1042 followers, XX engagements
"@southernmsgurl @grok @ke_kate @ms_disaffected @ProjectLincoln Hopefully all of them if the deal causes the insured to experience hikes"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T16:36Z 1045 followers, XX engagements
"@southernmsgurl @grok @ke_kate @ms_disaffected @ProjectLincoln Nope. Bundle the ACA premiums and this all goes away"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T16:36Z 1042 followers, XX engagements
"@southernmsgurl @grok @ke_kate @ms_disaffected @ProjectLincoln Sustainability starts with stability. You cant reform a system by crashing it first. A short-term fix that keeps coverage intact gives room for real reform instead of chaos"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T16:52Z 1044 followers, XX engagements
"@southernmsgurl @grok @ke_kate @ms_disaffected @ProjectLincoln Im not here to score party points. I'm not a Democrat. I just want people to stay insured and the government to function. Whoevers in charge should fix it instead of arguing over who gets the credit or the blame"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T16:59Z 1045 followers, XX engagements
"@southernmsgurl @grok @ke_kate @ms_disaffected @ProjectLincoln The costs didnt keep climbing after 2020 they leveled out as more people got insured. Covering people up front costs less than paying for medical debt and emergency care later"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T18:58Z 1037 followers, XX engagements
"@southernmsgurl @grok @ke_kate @ms_disaffected @ProjectLincoln The ACA didnt cause costs to rise. It made pricing honest. Before you could buy cheap plans that dropped you when you got sick. Once coverage became real it showed what care actually costs"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T19:18Z 1046 followers, XX engagements
"Exactly and thats the point; ALICE households are working families who earn too much for traditional aid but still cant meet basic costs. Thats precisely why subsidy caps mattered: they kept coverage within reach for people who fall between poverty and comfort not giveaways but guardrails against medical debt"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T19:56Z 1038 followers, XX engagements
"@southernmsgurl @grok @ke_kate @ms_disaffected @ProjectLincoln It was extended past the pandemic because premiums kept climbing faster than wages. The expiration date was set for budget reasons not because the need disappeared"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T20:40Z 1046 followers, XX engagements
"Your assumption that the subsidies were meant as temporary pandemic relief isnt accurate. They were expanded under the American Rescue Plan to fix the subsidy cliff and extended through 2025 under the Inflation Reduction Act so Congress could reassess costs not end them. The expiration was a budget window not an intent to roll back coverage"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T20:47Z 1047 followers, XX engagements
"@southernmsgurl @grok @ke_kate @ms_disaffected @ProjectLincoln It wasnt about everyone being sick; it was about costs outpacing wages long before COVID. The pandemic just exposed how fragile coverage was. The fix made the math sustainable not medical; it corrected a cost gap that still exists today"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T20:54Z 1033 followers, XX engagements
"@southernmsgurl @grok @ke_kate @ms_disaffected @ProjectLincoln Right because the XXX% cap was the flaw; they fixed it during COVID but it was a preexisting affordability issue not a pandemic invention"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T21:02Z 1046 followers, XX engagements
"@southernmsgurl @grok @ke_kate @ms_disaffected @ProjectLincoln @grok explain that quote"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T21:06Z 1034 followers, X engagements
"@southernmsgurl @grok @ke_kate @ms_disaffected @ProjectLincoln Its sustainable as long as its funded the same way the Inflation Reduction Act did with offsets like the corporate tax and drug savings; CBO pegged the cost as modest and keeping coverage stable actually saves more downstream than cutting it would"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T21:08Z 1047 followers, XX engagements
"The Inflation Reduction Act has largely worked as intended. It cut prescription costs drove record clean-energy investment and still reduced the deficit by about $XXX billion over a decade. EPA data shows emissions are on track to fall up to XX% below 2005 levels by 2030. The CBO found it stayed budget-neutral under Senate rules thanks to offsets like the corporate tax and drug savings. Weak points are slower private-sector rollout and only modest short-term inflation impact. Overall its fiscally sound climate-effective and structurally stable though long-term sustainability depends on"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T21:15Z 1047 followers, XX engagements
"@southernmsgurl @grok @ke_kate @ms_disaffected @ProjectLincoln It didnt really overstate them; most analyses including from CBO and Penn Wharton said upfront the inflation drop would be modest but the real macro gains were in energy investment deficit reduction and manufacturing growth all of which have largely materialized"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T21:19Z 1045 followers, XX engagements
"@grok @southernmsgurl @ke_kate @ms_disaffected @ProjectLincoln"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T21:20Z 1045 followers, XX engagements
"The focus now is on implementation; energy tax credits ballooned because demand exploded especially for EV and solar manufacturing which ate into early deficit savings. But those credits also built a domestic clean-tech base so the key question isnt cost alone its whether that investment keeps paying back through jobs exports and reduced fossil dependence over the decade"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T21:34Z 1041 followers, XX engagements
"@southernmsgurl @grok @ke_kate @ms_disaffected @ProjectLincoln Then whats the alternative long-term keep burning fuels that get pricier and geopolitically riskier every year or invest upfront in systems that eventually run on free sunlight"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T21:52Z 1040 followers, XX engagements
"Thats selective citation again. The Baicker study youre invoking covered early pilot states with limited data and noted the effects were temporary and small fading within two years as labor markets adjusted. Later NBER updates and CBO reviews found those early reductions disappeared entirely once expansions stabilized. Short-term adjustment isnt dependency; its the system absorbing new coverage before returning to baseline employment"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T22:15Z 1046 followers, XX engagements
"@VirilityMaxxed @StephenM By watching 👀 Watching and documenting isn't impeding"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T22:57Z 1042 followers, XXX engagements
"@Festivus96 @StephenM That is obvious amd it's not what the EO does"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T23:16Z 1045 followers, XXX engagements
"@grok @Poolguy702 @StephenM Hines struck a parallel registration system with new duties and penalties. Illinoiss EO adds none. Any other examples"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T23:55Z 1037 followers, XX engagements
"@ThomasSayre13 @Boomerjeff @StephenM You are conflating legal discretion with breaking the law; federal law lets the executive decide how to enforce immigration rules and the Supreme Court confirmed in Heckler v. Chaney that choosing priorities isnt the same as ignoring the law"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T00:24Z 1042 followers, XX engagements
"@grok @Poolguy702 @StephenM Thanks grok 🤣"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T00:31Z 1037 followers, XX engagements
"@grok @Poolguy702 @StephenM Sure Grok 🤣"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T00:32Z 1037 followers, X engagements
"No 1324 punishes concealment transport or inducement not political speech or policy disagreement. A website even if critical isnt harboring or transporting anyone. If officials actually blocked federal agents thatd raise a Supremacy Clause issue; but words alone dont meet the statutes criminal threshold"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T00:35Z 1037 followers, XX engagements
"This is simply not how the courts interpret 1324. It applies to direct acts like transporting concealing or aiding entry not to public policy or enforcement discretion. Courts like U.S. v. Henderson and U.S. v. Aguilar made clear that encourage or induce means active facilitation not political decisions or speech"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T00:47Z 1042 followers, XX engagements
"@ThomasSayre13 @Boomerjeff @StephenM She was convicted for selling fake immigration help for profit not for a policy decision. The Court vacated the ruling because the 9th Circuit overreached not because it expanded 1324. Nothing in that case supports criminalizing a governor for a healthcare program"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T04:34Z 1037 followers, XX engagements
"@ThomasSayre13 @grok @Boomerjeff @StephenM"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T07:12Z 1040 followers, XX engagements
"@grok @Festivus96 @StephenM Which arguments do you think festivus had that were not empirically grounded"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T19:35Z 1045 followers, X engagements
"@grok @Poolguy702 @StephenM What part of Pritzker's executive order calls for harassment"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T22:59Z 1048 followers, XX engagements
"@grok @Poolguy702 @StephenM Speculative risk isnt the same as unlawful action"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T23:03Z 1045 followers, XX engagements
"@grok @Poolguy702 @StephenM Thats hypothetical. The order doesnt presume unlawfulness"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T23:04Z 1048 followers, XX engagements
"@grok @Poolguy702 @StephenM The phrase unlawful attacks describes allegations not assumptions. Investigating alleged abuses isnt delegitimizing law"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T23:05Z 1048 followers, XX engagements
"@grok @Poolguy702 @StephenM The Supremacy Clause bars obstruction not observation. Illinois cant halt deportations but it can document their effects. "
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T23:10Z 1048 followers, XX engagements
"@grok @Poolguy702 @StephenM I guess we can see if the supreme court agrees. But nothing in the EO's language obstructs"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T23:24Z 1048 followers, XX engagements
"@grok @Poolguy702 @StephenM Arizona barred states from making their own immigration rules not from documenting federal actions; Illinois observes conduct it doesnt regulate it"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T23:28Z 1048 followers, XX engagements
"@grok @Poolguy702 @StephenM Garamendi was foreign-affairs preemption states cant contradict U.S. diplomacy. Do you have another example"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T23:42Z 1045 followers, XX engagements
"@grok @Poolguy702 @StephenM Engine Manufacturers barred purchase mandates that changed market behavior. Illinoiss EO changes nothing operational or economic. Any other example"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T23:52Z 1046 followers, XX engagements
"@grok @Poolguy702 @StephenM Crosby and Geier voided state measures that changed conduct; Any other example"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T00:10Z 1048 followers, XX engagements
"@grok @Poolguy702 @StephenM McCulloch barred states from taxing federal entities; Illinoiss EO imposes no cost or compulsion. Any other examples"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T00:11Z 1048 followers, XX engagements
"@ThomasSayre13 @Boomerjeff @StephenM Sanctuary policies dont block federal law they just limit how state resources are used. The Supreme Court made that distinction clear in Murphy v. NCAA: the feds cant force states to carry out federal enforcement"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T00:27Z 1049 followers, XX engagements
"@grok @Poolguy702 @StephenM Crosby dealt with a state law that directly conflicted with federal foreign policy. Illinoiss EO doesnt impose sanctions or alter enforcement. Find another example"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T00:29Z 1045 followers, XX engagements
"If someones calling for violence or doxxing agents thats already criminal under threat and harassment laws; no one disputes that. But 1324 doesnt cover speech or websites; it targets physical acts of transport concealment or inducement. Different statutes different elements"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T00:39Z 1049 followers, XX engagements
"The clear text says its a crime to conceal harbor or shield from detection someone you know is in the U.S. illegally; that means physically hiding them or helping them evade arrest. Courts have ruled that harboring requires direct intentional aid like giving shelter false documents or transport. Refusing to help ICE or setting city policy isnt that; its a political decision not concealment under 1324"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T00:52Z 1049 followers, XX engagements
"@ThomasSayre13 @Boomerjeff @StephenM You're not making a case for inciting a riot"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T01:12Z 1049 followers, X engagements
"@ThomasSayre13 @Boomerjeff @StephenM "Democrats organize the attacks to interfere with illegal alien removal operations" This is a uselessly broad claim that does nothing to prove whether or not sanctuary cities are legal"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T01:13Z 1049 followers, XX engagements
"@ThomasSayre13 @Boomerjeff @StephenM Again you just say democrats as if it's a magic word. It's not a strong legal case that's for sure"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T01:14Z 1049 followers, XX engagements
"@Boomerjeff @TheDreadPop @StephenM If they directly block then they can be arrested. That has nothing to do with what Stephen Miller is talking about"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T01:26Z 1049 followers, XX engagements
"@grok @Festivus96 @StephenM Well we can establish one thing. He blocked me. I didn't block him. If he has a valid argument he should be able to defend it without blocking. Thanks grok"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T19:21Z 1045 followers, X engagements
"@grok @Festivus96 @StephenM Say Grok since he's made so many wonderful points. And he's destroying me in this debate why don't you encourage him to come back unblock me"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T19:32Z 1045 followers, X engagements
"The idea that Christians dont run the banking industry doesnt hold up. Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase is Greek Orthodox. Brian Moynihan of Bank of America is Catholic. Christian Sewing runs Deutsche Bank. Ken Costa former chairman of Lazard International is outspoken about faith in finance. Even Christian credit unions like AdelFi and Americas Christian Credit Union operate across the U.S. So while banking is diverse its not as if Christians are locked out of leadership. Theyre at the very top"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-19T17:05Z 1045 followers, 3620 engagements
"The attachment-a spreadsheet detailing over $XXX million in grants from progressive foundations to various left-leaning organizations-does not indicate that individual protesters were paid to participate in the "No Kings" protests on October XX 2025. Instead it reflects funding to nonprofit groups likely involved in organizing logistics and advocacy for the events. While there are partisan allegations and anecdotal reports suggesting some paid activists or "professional protesters" were present comprehensive evidence from multiple sources shows no widespread payments to the estimated 7"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-20T20:45Z 1045 followers, 34.3K engagements
"@elonmusk Remember it's very important"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-22T16:58Z 1045 followers, 48.6K engagements
"@GavinNewsom Vote YES on Prop XX. It's temporary and it pushes back against Trump's authoritarianism"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-22T20:43Z 1045 followers, 3004 engagements
"@MAGAVoice I would love that. He would lose and he would be humiliated by the ads"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-22T21:26Z 1045 followers, 10.7K engagements
"@grok @Poolguy702 @StephenM Arizona struck state arrest powers and prosecutions not observation. Any other examples"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-23T23:56Z 1045 followers, XX engagements
"@msholly @StephenM In constitutional or statutory contexts an enemy can be seen as as people engaged in rebellion or insurrection against the U.S. Like the J6ers for example"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T00:57Z 1045 followers, XXX engagements
"@MountainGal2023 @StephenM Thats not how federalism works. States cant ignore federal rulings. But neither can can they be forced to carry out federal enforcement. Supremacy Clause still stands Tenth Amendment limits compulsion not compliance"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T03:35Z 1045 followers, 1080 engagements
"@ThomasSayre13 @Boomerjeff @StephenM Were not arguing originalism here were talking about how the courts have actually interpreted 1324 in modern rulings. Thats what governs today's reality not 18th-century musings"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T04:16Z 1045 followers, XX engagements
"@ThomasSayre13 @Boomerjeff @StephenM Youre missing the point of Sineneng-Smith. The Court didnt expand 1324. It vacated the lower ruling and noted theres no record of it being used beyond direct inducement or fraud. Its never touched policy or funding. Thats not my opinion thats the case history"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T05:10Z 1046 followers, XX engagements
"@reserveclaret18 @MountainGal2023 @grok my last comment is not wrong. Do I need a law degree to know what Federalism is"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T06:16Z 1045 followers, XX engagements
"@grok @ThomasSayre13 @Boomerjeff @StephenM"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T06:19Z 1045 followers, X engagements
"@real1CSB @StephenM @grok explain why sanctuary cities are legal"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T17:13Z 1045 followers, XX engagements
"Two examples Sure. First documenting when federal raids spill into state or local jurisdictions without notice; so Illinois can update coordination protocols and avoid confusion or panic. Second tracking patterns of misconduct or mistaken detentions so Federal lawmakers can use it to tighten safeguards or training next session. Both are policy feedback loops not oversight or control"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T18:09Z 1045 followers, XX engagements
"@Festivus96 @StephenM Right and thats still outside the EO. The order doesnt change or challenge Illinois sanctuary policy; it just tracks what happens when federal actions spill into the state. You keep arguing policy when the EOs about paperwork"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T18:35Z 1045 followers, X engagements
"@Festivus96 @StephenM Nice panic framing. Youve now shifted from law to imagined violence. Nothing in the EO discloses agent identities; its about aggregate data not personal details. Conflating administrative transparency with arson isnt debate its fear-spinning. You got anything better"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T18:48Z 1045 followers, XX engagements
"@shamusGC @TheDemocrats Trump should make a deal to keep people insured. Easily done if he is as good as he says and cares about people losing healthcare"
X Link @CuriousMrFox101 2025-10-24T19:52Z 1046 followers, XXX engagements