@Cryptopia13 Avatar @Cryptopia13 balouthebear

balouthebear posts on X about $btc, chainlink, $link, bitcoin the most. They currently have [-----] followers and [----] posts still getting attention that total [---] engagements in the last [--] hours.

Engagements: [---] #

Engagements Line Chart

Mentions: [--] #

Mentions Line Chart

Followers: [-----] #

Followers Line Chart

CreatorRank: [---------] #

CreatorRank Line Chart

Social Influence

Social category influence cryptocurrencies finance stocks currencies technology brands automotive brands exchanges countries social networks travel destinations

Social topic influence $btc #2599, chainlink, $link, bitcoin, money, token, $eth, xrp, $xrp, sol

Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @bumlebi @chainlink @agentchud @grok @btcforfreedom @peterschiff @battlejeff1 @danyalos @btcrabbithole @btcglobalresrv @lynaldencontact @chainlinkgod @kenhuys @klos @zksync @catfishfishy @profplum99 @jvisserlabs @larrylogical @laforgezak

Top assets mentioned Bitcoin (BTC) Chainlink (LINK) Ethereum (ETH) XRP (XRP) Barrick Gold Corp. (GOLD) Dogecoin (DOGE) Solana (SOL) zkSync (ZK) Arbitrum (ARB) Optimism (OP) BNB (BNB) Sui (SUI) Grayscale BTC ETF (GBTC) Alphabet Inc Class A (GOOGL) Coinbase Global Inc. (COIN) Game.com (GTC2) Space and Time (SXT) Mario Coin (COIN) Quant (QNT) Strategy (MSTR) Celestia (TIA) Aleph Zero (AZERO) Pyth Network (PYTH) GMX (GMX)

Top Social Posts

Top posts by engagements in the last [--] hours

"@Shadzrick @chainlink @ltoadnft Nice thread - however a lot of the arguments/context is just circumstantial and there is still a lot of hope included. At this stage it is just not clear who is reaping the benefits of the $Link network and how things like velocity of money (that impedes value accrual) play out"
X Link 2023-05-29T06:07Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@Shadzrick @chainlink @ltoadnft Not what I meant. If velocity of money is high later once subsidies are gone (in combination with quadratic staking = a lot less demand for staked $link than most expect) it might not be the $link token that accrues the value created. Not sure who reaps the benefits then though"
X Link 2023-05-29T15:37Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@Shadzrick @chainlink @ltoadnft High token velocity means that tokens are circulating very fast and converted very fast to USD(C) or whatever = the token is not accruing value because there is always a boatload of supply. Same problem $Xrp has for instance. Their token will never accrue any meaningful value"
X Link 2023-05-29T19:26Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@Shadzrick @chainlink @ltoadnft Current expectation of the market is that the incentives that we know of are NOT sufficient for holders to hold and for the token to accrue value. Hence the poor performance of the $link token even after the release of the economics [---] roadmap. Lets hope you are right though"
X Link 2023-05-29T20:04Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@Shadzrick @chainlink @ltoadnft Yeah I know but not all investors are stupid or simply short-term-driven. If the current value capture mechanic would be sufficient or if it was already clear that incentives are strong enough to have a comp. low token velocity smart money would drive the price up slowly"
X Link 2023-05-29T20:24Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@Shadzrick @chainlink @ltoadnft True - but as you say nothing is guaranteed or risk-free. However a lot lines up for $Link in terms of products and business development and this is going almost completely unnoticed or with any price impact. A strong indicator that incentives are not right/sufficient right now"
X Link 2023-05-30T06:09Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"Hypothesis for what is currently happening in #crypto markets: There is currently a major repricing happening: [--]. $BTC not affected by the actions of the #SEC = more or less unchanged and just slightly negative since the whole outlook on #crypto became a bit more bearish"
X Link 2023-06-10T20:19Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"2. $ETH: Fundamentally stronger than $BTC but not yet cleared from this Security: yes/no - issue as of yet. $Matic among the alleged securities which uses the same EIP-1559 as $ETH = $ETH a bit more in danger and therefore a bit more down than $BTC"
X Link 2023-06-10T20:19Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"c) US retail investors having a very hard time of getting #altcoins: - Most important on-ramp for crypto (#coinbase) under siege; - crypto-friendly banks like Silvergate etc have been attacked before; - instructions to other banks not to cater to #crypto;"
X Link 2023-06-10T20:19Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@Spudlink1 @cnlinkcnlink @DMG3465 That is a very important question. If the token velocity is high (so if tokens get sold back basically immediately) then the value accrual for the $link token will be significantly hampered. (Quadratic staking another factor diminishing value accrual for the $link token)"
X Link 2023-06-14T07:16Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@NickDrakon only really troubling case right now. And even if hed just sell more liquid and less stressed stuff right now. So if not 80% of $USDT holder dont want to cash out right now (which did not happen during much bigger crises) at the same time whats the issue What am I missing"
X Link 2023-06-15T09:41Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@LinkChelloveck @chainlink They probably need to do that and it is a very smart move. Otherwise they would be way more in the centre of this US-centric security: Yes/No discussion. Still not off the hook but at least not on one of the lists as of now"
X Link 2023-06-17T13:18Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@LinkChelloveck @chainlink I hope they dont. Companies listed on stock exchanges dont do that either. Whats the point in talking about something that is to a large extent dependent on external factors mainly market forces Just a way to even further upset $link token holders if false promises are made"
X Link 2023-06-17T13:21Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@LinkChelloveck @chainlink Yeah - but #chainlink is not about to take out a loan on their token holdings. So the question is just irrelevant to them from this perspective. And even if it was relevant for them - they are just one (admittedly large) market participant out of many"
X Link 2023-06-17T13:47Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@LinkChelloveck @chainlink Your idea of #Chainlink labs talking about price would really open up a can of worms. There would be issues in regards to - security: Yes/No - market manipulation since they are a large market participant and have pricing power - etc Too much downside and not much upside"
X Link 2023-06-17T13:51Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@FelipeCrypto success/relevance of #chainlink and value accrual of the $link token are two very distinct aspects right now. At the current state it is simply not clear if and how the token actually accrues value and many people doubt it will short-medium term or even ever. Lets see"
X Link 2023-06-19T11:32Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@nas49001254 It does not change. Works for $link like this since years now. Everytime the token would break out to the upside though something happens with $BTC again. This is already a meme now"
X Link 2023-06-21T12:02Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@JSpitTrades @WClementeIII Bitcoin mining is not a good business model - there are simply no excess returns because of new miners and difficulty adjustments. $Coin on the other hand has so much more to offer than just being an exchange. They are basically everywhere in crypto (Base etc). Take a look"
X Link 2023-06-26T07:04Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@ParrotCapital I am really curious to how that plays out"
X Link 2023-08-25T16:59Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@kararesurrect In your example if it does only a 10x then it is not a good investment or an investment at all compared to $btc or $eth (and probably also not to $sol etc). $link much more volatile and lost out a lot on a comparative basis against $eth and $btc in this bear market phase"
X Link 2023-08-31T07:21Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@JohnReedStark @RichRogers_ If this was the case you should celebrate and go on a victory lap. $BTC is the most transparent asset on the planet and every #Satoshi can be traced back anytime back to its origin - forever. So $BTC the most stupid means of payment in existence for a ransomware attack"
X Link 2023-09-14T14:29Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@IamZeroIka They have made it abundantly clear they are not interested in $BTC and are liquidating it. Since they are not morons theyll sell gradually and in a way to maximise returns. Everything else/interpretations that they might have taken an interest in it is just coping-behaviour"
X Link 2023-09-17T11:40Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@intocryptoverse Has not much to do with $BTC or pre-halving. The future outlook for these projects is just not that good because they are losing ground competitive-wise. Stronger projects like $eth or even #kaspa or $ton are not losing and sometimes massively outperforming $btc"
X Link 2023-09-18T08:30Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@Curic_official @Pankekkeku Yeah true. Two main aspects to that though: [--]. Public Blockchains are a public good with economic incentives - you dont have that in most other areas. [--]. Blockchain technology has its merits mainly when open and permissionless - otherwise a database is often a better choice"
X Link 2023-09-20T21:05Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@jrp_gg @2shabby In my opinion: Airdop farmers - especially if done at scale - bring not just zero but even negative value to a chain. Great for VCs because they can make a big buck and exit but from an economic perspective negative in quite a couple of different dimensions:"
X Link 2023-09-24T10:33Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@jrp_gg @2shabby - true activity and relevancy of the chain is disguised = TVL active wallets etc are all pretty much useless metrics - They extract lots of value if an Airdrop actually takes place - The extracted value is in the wrong hands and concentrated = hinders decentralisation - etc"
X Link 2023-09-24T10:36Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@Govanisher $ETH has high fees because it has demand. So this is a bullish sign. Additionally $ETH has incentives to hold - in contrast to $btc; lower market cap lindy effect working for it as well as $btc.; also an #etf looming etc etc. I would take the complete opposite position"
X Link 2023-09-24T12:49Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@Crypto___Oracle $Link Marines have had a long long time to learn about patience and humility. Basically always when $BTC starts to pick up (and $Link with it) or when we see bullish posts like this something happens that drags $Link down again. Lets see what happens this time"
X Link 2023-09-25T08:51Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@nicucrypto Just wait for it - the next couple of days with a US government showdown are sadly timed perfectly again to tank $btc $link etc once again before $link could finally break out. Every time:"
X Link 2023-09-30T05:55Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@Zedzies Data Streams"
X Link 2023-10-02T08:20Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@marionavarro702 @ourcryptotalk @quant_network #chainlink. Have a look what #swift - the global payment processor - has presented at their #sibos conference two weeks ago or what was discussed and presented at #smartcon the last two days"
X Link 2023-10-04T13:24Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@ChainLinkGod Said the same a couple of days ago. $Link is not tailored towards retail and retail does not decide the fate of it. The same is true for some other plays. So just a waste of time the recent disputes with and dunks on the $QNT holders. Why not just being nice to each other then"
X Link 2023-10-06T10:26Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@ourcryptotalk I like your approach. Have not much of a clue about $QNT though - but when reading this about $QNT: Both are doing basically the exact same thing in all areas you mentioned. However the fate of $Link $QNT or whatever is not decided by retail - so it doesnt make sense to argue"
X Link 2023-10-06T10:33Z [---] followers, [----] engagements

"@BuyMoreLink Just curious - is there a way to invest in Fireblocks It seems to be everywhere - like $link"
X Link 2023-10-06T21:01Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@AirdropAlertAAD @Galxe Why and for what specifically would a regular user have given permission to this Smart Contract"
X Link 2023-10-06T21:03Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@ChainLinkGod What is your take on velocity of token flows In other words if the velocity of token flows is high the token cannot accrue too much value. Do you regard the incentives to hold $Link currently implemented sufficient enough to counteract a high token flow velocity"
X Link 2023-10-07T19:58Z [---] followers, [----] engagements

"@DrakeLinked @ChainLinkGod 1/2 That is true in general. But there are specific factors here at play with $link. Super-linear staking reduces the amount of staked tokens for Node Operators by a landslide (exponential function working against $link accruing value). If staking more for NOs makes sense"
X Link 2023-10-08T09:15Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@DrakeLinked @ChainLinkGod 2/2 for reputation remains to be seen. In any case there will be an optimum which is lower than most expect. Retail will only stake and hence reduce velocity of token flow if it makes sense economically. Opp. cost are high in crypto. Right now only true fans are staking"
X Link 2023-10-08T09:19Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@ChainLinkGod Just curious - how is a private blockchain (which is simply a database in most cases because of a small number (sometimes = 1) of Nodes) superior to a database and an API Mainly the ability to tap into public Blockchains Or is there more"
X Link 2023-10-08T09:24Z [--] followers, [---] engagements

"@ChainLinkGod @DrakeLinked Yeah - I get that. I dont really have a clue so far though how this reputation and staking as signalling for NOs will pan out eventuallyThat super-linear staking is per DON does not matter much I guess - there are many DONs already as youve pointed out too"
X Link 2023-10-08T19:16Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@Don_ChainLink To be fair - I think it is not exponential anymore. Probably on the contrary - at least percentage-wise slowing down meaningfully. But the tally of course still exceptional"
X Link 2023-10-12T05:36Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@TheCryptoBull77 Nah 😉 - too complicated for most users/retail people - not geared towards retail so retail does not get in touch with it anyway - ability to capture value still unclear - = does not give instant gratification - almost everybody on Twitter/X fades it - "
X Link 2023-10-12T08:35Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@KashKysh If this is the way then $ZKS is not worth it and it does not deserve attention. Collection personal/identity data and connecting it with Blockchain addresses doxes people and puts targets on their backs. This isnt the #web3 way. Pretty sure there are other ways to fight sybils"
X Link 2023-10-13T19:28Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@JJcycles If hes right - it shouldnt be too dramatic and rescue is on its way. Additionally $btc cant solve this right now: Too small; no incentives to hold = it fluctuates way too much (also due to a ton of derivatives on top of it); no actual usage as of yet"
X Link 2023-10-14T05:48Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@iceman00008 @ChainLinkGod @Justin_Bons @Coconut_Kai Hopefully not - this would put a target on their backs. Having control over #chainlink services is one of the biggest honeypots out there. Why would you want to provide a detailed guide to exploit it"
X Link 2023-10-14T10:38Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@JackNiewold A lot of the stuff on top of the market cap list does not make much sense. I mean why is $doge $Xrp etc - so all that meme coins with still no proper use-case - so far up"
X Link 2023-10-18T12:09Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@Palatineoffacts So if $link goes down too we can blame you for that 😉"
X Link 2023-10-18T12:48Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@Pickle_cRypto $link is not just a RWA play. There are other use-cases that could make up for your case"
X Link 2023-10-18T13:53Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@DMG3465 Right now the $link token is not capturing (at least a part of) utility #chainlink creates. Up until then not much will change for the price of the $link token. It just does not matter if just [--] or all of the banks are using #ccip.So the issue is a different one"
X Link 2023-10-19T11:42Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@denverbitcoin 1/2 An $etc comes with additional perks: [--]. If approved it would be the first time that a government agency approves of $btc = a bit like if a drug is legalised = target audience increases tremendously [--]. If the etf is from #blackrock = there is a strong signalling effect"
X Link 2023-10-31T08:23Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@Govanisher Well my base case is $eth spot etf is the second one well get this cycle. If theres a $btc etf there is [--] logical reason why there would not be an $eth etf too. Different for all the other coins - but $eth basically on par with $btc and consensus that its not a security"
X Link 2023-11-04T01:29Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@EsDuex At this rate most of us will be living in a retirement home for [--] years or longer before there is even a theoretical chance that this could happen. Next version still just 4.5% of Total Supply if it gets maxed out"
X Link 2023-11-11T10:09Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@zolandinho If you actually did this they will probably cut you out of their wills. Higher risk is basically not possible. You have like a 50:50 chance. If Spot $BTC ETFs get denied or postponed till Friday it will go back to Goblin-Town for your bags"
X Link 2023-11-15T20:27Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@zolandinho I know - I have probably just a slightly different risk profile than you. Hope it works out for both of us though"
X Link 2023-11-15T20:50Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@ChainlinkMongol My money would be on that it flips $BTC and not $ETH. $ETH with its basically non-inflation approach AND a yield is basically the pipe-dream of institutional investors. After an #ETF for it this will be much bigger than $BTC because $BTC will just do what it always did: range"
X Link 2023-11-22T09:48Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@StanManLister @eschketit In general you are right. However - it will not run out of supply - there are people sitting on 5-30x already and they will gladly unload their bags. Additionally inflation not bad per se - see $Sol for instance. Went on a tear last cycle while supply increased manifold"
X Link 2023-11-23T11:59Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@ASvanevik @nansen_ai So [----] then 👀"
X Link 2023-11-23T12:30Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@ChainlinkChino Seems a bit few and not much compared to my [--] Billion $link. Is there a reason why you did not buy more once it was cheap Am I missing something Anything wrong with $link that I am not aware of"
X Link 2023-11-27T22:27Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@DMG3465 There is at least an equally good argument for a sell-off to make here. More than 600k $btc from #grayscale become tradable and these were gobbled up by short-term oriented hedge funds etc. Just for reference: Mining rewards for a whole year equal to 32.4k $btc currently"
X Link 2023-11-28T21:59Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@mikealfred They can probably just gobble up the #grayscale $btc. A lot of the supply there was bought from distressed holders by short-term oriented hedge-funds etc. These people are very happily handing over their stacks after making big bank in a short period of time themselves"
X Link 2023-11-28T22:24Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@VentureCoinist Some of them are not bullish. Halving is just nonsense (just compare the 162k $BTC less block rewards per year with the 600k $BTC Grayscale unlocks after the #etf). Rate cuts typically also a bearish event because they happen when the economy is showing weakness"
X Link 2023-11-29T19:18Z [---] followers, [----] engagements

"@chainlink How How would the connection betw. physical product and #nft be made There has to be some trusted person/entity/etc who confirms that the shoes are (still) in perfect condition or that they are dirty from wearing If I need someone to confirm the status - where is the benefit"
X Link 2023-12-02T15:11Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@UPUPSOON Suggesting a new rule: Every time someone posts something like this and it is not happening this person has to donate [--] $link into a pool. The pool will go to who guesses best this cycles $link top. Have seen so many similar posts recently and ALL (100.0%) of them were wrong"
X Link 2023-12-03T12:34Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@Cryptorozviedka @TheCryptoBull77 Probably more valuable in the longer run than $ETH. Total Addressable Market of $Link is probably 100x larger than the one from $ETH. $ETH competes with Trad-Fi other public and private chains etc. $Link does not and additionally also in logistics and many areas outside of Fin"
X Link 2023-12-03T15:20Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@BuyMoreLink The first part is in line with other $BTC price predictions after an #etf gets approved. @coinbureau just released such a video today about how @glassnode for instance has a similar view"
X Link 2023-12-03T17:05Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@chainlinkchad69 @chainlink @ChrisBarrett Would be much much much more interested in #build rewards distributed in a way that it includes V.0.1 staking"
X Link 2023-12-07T11:17Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@Crypto___Oracle Well $Link is a utility token with the risk of having a high circulation velocity of the token = no/low value accrual for the token. What people currently are treating differently are mainly platforms/coins with a different outlook/potential"
X Link 2023-12-13T13:23Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@linkminx I dont agree with this take. An investor has to factor in opportunity costs too. And these are tremendous right now when other major alts (which are investments too) are ripping while $link is breaking down again. $Avax $Sol etc come to mind - already on the move again rn"
X Link 2023-12-13T14:41Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@linkminx Nah - unfortunately not - bought in the later half of [----] and some in [----] too. Still holding because from a fundamental perspective it should be #1-#3. Just wondering and questioning why it isnt already there since it should be quite obvious by now"
X Link 2023-12-13T15:59Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@BuyMoreLink We are already in a bull market again. In a bull market euphoria comes in again which leads to prices outperforming fundamentals. Happening everywhere ($Avax $Sol etc). Since it is not happening for $link this could mean that fundamentals are not as strong as expected"
X Link 2023-12-14T07:33Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@NorthRockLP Does your opinion change if the #SEC only allows cash creation ETFs Not familiar with US regulation here - could this mean that $MSTR is still quite interesting after ETF approval or would a $MSTR stock have the same unfavourable tax treatment"
X Link 2023-12-14T09:20Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@Eric_Sr_ Finally a $link chart that seems to be based in reality. I am so tired and fed up of all the crappy and false moonshot predictions of the last couple of weeks that I basically muted all of these accounts. 👍 to you - keep up the good work"
X Link 2023-12-15T21:52Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@DesmoJustin $BTC is probably not a good investment right now. #etf coming is known and speculated on for a while. Additionally if $gbtc gets converted too - there might be a lot of sell pressure. Probably smarter to go into the next thing that gets speculated on for an $etf: $eth. NFA"
X Link 2023-12-18T08:43Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@dotkrueger 1/2 Never understood the halving argument. Supply reduction is completely negligible considering that $BTC is the most liquid asset on the planet. There is basically nobody who cannot sell their entire $BTC stack within lets say [--] hour (for the multisig-people)"
X Link 2023-12-21T11:11Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@dotkrueger 2/2 Additionally simply compare the amount of $BTC Grayscale is holding and that gets unlocked in an instant after #etf approval with the reduction of halving which is going into effect only block by block. Thats like approx. [--] years mining rewards after the halving"
X Link 2023-12-21T11:14Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@JimmyRagosa I guess 1inch was on Christmas 2020"
X Link 2023-12-24T14:54Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@rt100ml $Azero was probably the first blockchain that relied heavily on influencers at the start. Makes it appear strong on #X or other social media. A tremendous red flag for development though - who builds and wastes precious time and ressources on top of a marketing scheme"
X Link 2023-12-27T17:27Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@DefiDrew Nah - people know that and are already tired of it. Additionally I would assume it takes much much longer than expected. Swift and DTCC are among the slowest moving entities on the planet (simply too much to lose) - will take maybe years to see more than just these POC-concepts"
X Link 2023-12-28T09:13Z [--] followers, [--] engagements

"@CKvack @chainlink You have a good point with No. 2: Unfortunately there is a huge amount of #linkies that treat $link similar to other short-term-focussed projects and post very tiny moves TA etc. Of course 99% of that is then wrong because $link is a fundamental play = frustration = annoyance"
X Link 2023-12-29T11:29Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@CKvack @chainlink So I actually think a lot of these $link threadoors/shillers are doing $link a disservice. This is not community building - this is frustrating and annoying people and driving them away and to other projects"
X Link 2023-12-29T11:31Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@nullpackets Yeah - the same is true for $Link. This can and will also converted to $USD etc by node operators (that have to run their books in $USD or $EUR or whatever). This means the token might have a high circulation velocity = if this is the case = token will not accrue much value"
X Link 2023-12-31T11:15Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@BuyMoreLink Not sure about that. Similar to $Link. Tokenomics are just horrible. Without proper incentives to hold the respective token the velocity of token flows is just too high which leads to the token not gaining in value. $Xrp would be a third and more prominent example for that"
X Link 2024-01-01T17:54Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@DutchInDepth #chainlink can be THE project on the planet that creates the most value for any person/org. ever. Yet $Link price can still be around [--] $usd - forever. Absolutely possible and at this stage the most likely outcome. $link right now just not able to capture the value CL creates"
X Link 2024-01-02T14:05Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@DutchInDepth #chainlink labs team does not need a higher token price either. Since they are involved in actual services (running nodes etc) and still sit on a huge pile of $link a low token price and a high token velocity is not a problem for them. Its just a problem for (retail) investors"
X Link 2024-01-02T14:25Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@DutchInDepth The system - same with $Grt or $Xrp or you name it - is just running perfectly fine with a low token price. Stability of the token price is even better than $link going up. After all its used by businesses and what do businesses need most: Stability and reliability (Econ 101)"
X Link 2024-01-02T14:27Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@DutchInDepth Yeah - maybe they come up with further ideas for the $link token to capitalise on the utility #chainlink as a service creates in the future. Right now its just not the case. We cant even lend $link to someone because you only get 0.01% interest on #aave for instance"
X Link 2024-01-02T15:57Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@trueLinkMarine Many projects already trading = they already have a price tag. Since only a small amount of tokens is dedicated to #chainlink and only a portion of that goes to stakers = for the projects known and already trading this is just dust for basically any staker so far"
X Link 2024-01-02T19:41Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@UPUPSOON Nobody is questioning that. The question everybody has and which is much more relevant: Will the $link token eventually capture at least some of the value #chainlink creates Or who/what else is reaping the benefits of the value created here"
X Link 2024-01-02T20:14Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@kyle_chasse We are just about to see wether $Link will be able to capture any value #chainlink creates for #crypto and/or #tradfi. So far there is [--] value capture going on. The service is great but beneficiaries are not the token holders. Lets see if/how this might change"
X Link 2024-01-02T21:20Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@ChainlinkP $BTC and $ETH are 100x resp. 33x the size of $Link. The fact that you needed these two in your post for comparison simply shows how insanely crappy $link did this year. I wonder if there is any (smaller) coin/token in the top [---] - except stables - that did as poor as $Link"
X Link 2024-01-03T10:47Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@TheDynamicLink Just not enough as of now to capture even a tiny portion of the value #chainlink creates. How valuable $link is right now can you see when you e.g. want to lend it (Spoiler: basically 0.0% interest). Hopefully well see relevant changes here in the nearer future. Its needed"
X Link 2024-01-04T09:03Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@Pump_My_Bags This has nothing to do with #chainlink. #CCIP is related to $Ens. Vitalik has tweeted about that (and $ens is mooning because of that)"
X Link 2024-01-04T09:51Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@0x_gremlin @LineaBuild Sorry inscriptions on a chain that supports smart contracts and is quite cheap dont make sense. Additionally there are [--] billion of these - so [--] scarcity. Ill skip that oneespecially since again it tries to combine Web2 with Web3 data. The dumbest thing we do currently. 🤯"
X Link 2024-01-04T16:48Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@Wahndo_ USD [-----] as of writing. I think the market is pretty good at evaluating it. Right now the $link token does not capture any value #chainlink labs creates (= price should be much lower). However this might change at some point in the future (= current price seems ok)"
X Link 2024-01-06T07:12Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@ChainlinkP 2/2 It just takes time and willingness from #chainlink labs to try to align the two. Its at least on their list for [----]. As long as the $link token is so detached from the utility #chainlink creates it just creates false hopes by praising #chainlink without distinguishing $link"
X Link 2024-01-06T07:30Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@KenHuys @Chching_ Yeah - that is the problem. $link is like a strategic and long-term bet on #blockchain technology in general - if #chainlink can come up with a better use for $link. This takes time and does not work well with the short-attention span here or degen plays in #crypto world"
X Link 2024-01-06T07:46Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@KenHuys @ChainlinkP @chainlink Might be that $link becomes a universal gas token. Its not right now and will not be for years. Additionally a universal gas token runs the risk of a high token velocity = the token does not capture any value =there are further mechanics needed for $link to capture value"
X Link 2024-01-06T08:51Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@KenHuys @ChainlinkP @chainlink Why not High token velocity means that $link gets sold again after it is needed by an entity = [--] implication on supply & demand which drives the price. Additionally super-linear staking also works against $link accruing any value"
X Link 2024-01-06T08:56Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@KenHuys @ChainlinkP @chainlink Additionally it takes at least 5-15 years till we see that kind of volume. #swift #dtcc etc are all basically monopolists and the slowest moving entities on the planet. Simply no need for them to innovate and just too much to lose cause their current systems are working"
X Link 2024-01-06T08:58Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@KenHuys @ChainlinkP @chainlink How does this incentivise to hold $link I need a #chainlink service and the fees are e.g. [--] $link for that. I buy that right before I use the service and the [--] $link are sold by the node operator or whoever gets it right after to pay for their costs. Net effect: 0"
X Link 2024-01-06T09:00Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@KenHuys @ChainlinkP @chainlink That is my whole point - without incentives to hold (and I dont see any right now in production) the velocity of circulation is high = token does not increase in value. #chainlink knows this too - that is why its on their list for [----]. Lets hope they come up with sth good"
X Link 2024-01-06T09:03Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@KenHuys @ChainlinkP @chainlink Yeah - and that is the part that is not really working right now to my knowledge. Additionally we have no clue if you really need a lot of $link for signalling purposes as a node operator. I can just select a couple of nodes as somebody who needs #chainlink services"
X Link 2024-01-06T09:06Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@DesmoJustin I think you are missing the point here. There is a very clear disconnect between the utility #chainlink provides and the (absent) ability of the $link token to capture any of that value. $Link shillers just confuse the two and a lot of the disappointment stems from that"
X Link 2024-01-07T22:04Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@CharlieCrypto4 @DesmoJustin There is this thing called velocity of circulation. If this one is high - and without proper FURTHER incentives to hold $link it will be - they could capture [---] quadrillions in fees and the token would still barely move. The same problem other tokens like $Xrp have"
X Link 2024-01-08T23:39Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@conlanwall_eth People are not disputing that #chainlink is in talks with these entities or that #chainlink is providing a ton of utility. People are arguing that the $link token is not capturing any of the value created. These are two very different aspects"
X Link 2024-01-09T19:03Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@EricBalchunas Do we have any idea about the direction of the flows for #Grayscale How much of it was selling I mean theoretically their could have been basically [--] volume from outside the #crypto world and only $GBTC holders converting their stakes into the other ETFs"
X Link 2024-01-11T22:58Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@MushtaqBilalPhD Also not in the list of "Research & Analysis" Group (or any other group). Some geographic restrictions Or is this Plugin not available anymore at all"
X Link 2024-01-13T14:32Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@QwQiao I really dont get why you guys bring up #halving all the time. This has become so irrelevant. Grayscale #etf alone unlocked IN A DAY a similar amount of $BTC than what halving will reduce in [--] years. US Govt has $BTC equivalent to almost 1/3 of Grayscaleso [--] years"
X Link 2024-01-14T13:16Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@DefiDrew 1/2 Not sure if I can connect the dots here 😉. Not sure if the $ETH ETF and tokenization are not just [--] different things. IMO $ETH and an ETF for it (if they manage to give staking rewards to holders) is simply and mainly a competition to the store of value idea for $BTC"
X Link 2024-01-17T08:26Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@DefiDrew 2/2 If they manage to pass on staking rewards to $ETH etf holders you will have the pipe dream of institutional investors: Basically non-inflating non-state-issued money WITH a yield. Far superior to $BTC (in the eyes of all non-tech nerds who dont care about POS or POW)"
X Link 2024-01-17T08:30Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@lewi5 @Google @Meta @chainlink 1/2 Sorry you are still and again confusing #chainlink labs with the $link token - and this is why people become so salty. These are two very very different things. #chainlink labs becoming the most valuable company on the planet would still not need that $link rises in price"
X Link 2024-01-17T08:44Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@lewi5 @Google @Meta @chainlink $link has very different underlying factors (velocity of token circulation etc) than #chainlink labs. #chainlink labs is perfectly fine and can flourish even if the velocity of $link circulation is insanely high. $link would however probably even be lower in price then"
X Link 2024-01-17T08:47Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@wacy_time1 Why would anyone reward stakers of an oracle protocol $link is providing data and more for like 10x that of $Pyth and doing that for [--] years now. Staking is live for more than a year now. Never heard of anyone giving an airdrop to $link stakers"
X Link 2024-01-17T19:46Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@babyhodlerbtc @lewi5 @Google @Meta @chainlink I did not say that $link is worthless and it is not useless at all. I just said $link serves its purpose perfectly fine if the token price is $1 $12 or $50000. It simply does not matter if the velocity of $link circulation is very high"
X Link 2024-01-17T19:49Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@jayxbt2012 Its even worse. Never seen an airdrop that is so insanely geared towards the big stacks. $ARB $OP $TIA and basically all other airdrops that made sense did not neglect the little guy. $Manta will be an empty desert because the big mercenary capital will just leave again"
X Link 2024-01-18T08:54Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@NekozTek @zerolendxyz Disagree. $Manta was insanely geared towards big stacks and mercenary capital - in contrast to basically all relevant airdrops e.g. $Tia. The little guy was left out completely. There will be no users and Manta chain will be a desert once the few big stacks have left"
X Link 2024-01-18T11:43Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@BTC_Archive What a nonsense statistic Nothing else had something like $GBTC - so basically a closed fund that was converted to an #ETF. Basically nothing has happened in regards of $BTC this week except for some rotation from $GBTC to the other ones"
X Link 2024-01-18T22:28Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@Joshyysmartt These two could not be more different. $TIA created a community and awarded everybody. $Manta was a MLM-scheme and therefore heavily geared towards the big stack mercenary capital. Once this is gone (because it does what it does) $Manta Network will be a desert"
X Link 2024-01-19T22:07Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@Joshyysmartt Nah - we dont. We still dont get why a project would airdrop tokens to stakers of an oracle project. $Link stakers (and $Link is also very present on Solana or Cosmos if this is your argument) have not received a dime as of now - even though $Link is much more widespread"
X Link 2024-01-20T10:17Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@MehrdadD17 @Joshyysmartt Might be. But I dont care anyway. Dont own $Pyth so would need to buy some anyway. Think there are better opportunities to deploy (fresh) capital. Even if there are airdrops - [---] mio twitter thread are currently written about it by influencers = high dilution"
X Link 2024-01-20T23:36Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@thermo_nuc @thecryptocactus Yeah - awesome. Now they will rug us again when the inflows to the non-GBTC ETFs stop or even reverse too"
X Link 2024-01-23T14:38Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@Fiskantes Another negative of a points system: If you have it it comes with the expectation points = proportional amount of airdrop. This creates a heavy bias towards big stacks and favours KOLs = this is against the ethos of a participatory #Web3 and creates big issues down the road"
X Link 2024-01-24T09:57Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@BTC_Archive Great - and $GBTC is selling more than USD [---] million a day. They dont have funds forever but there are Mt. Gox US government Blockfi etc who can jump in. Not too great right now (and probably for quite a while). Hopefully early etf buyers will not throw in the towel too"
X Link 2024-01-24T15:40Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@CredibleCrypto Nobody said that $BTC etf flows would be negative because of $GBTC. The argument was that the (priced in) expectations for the ETFs start were way too high because a lot of short-term oriented people would also sell $GBTC. And thats how it came and thats why $BTC corrected"
X Link 2024-01-27T00:39Z [---] followers, [----] engagements

"@TheCryptoBull77 For some reason $Link seems to be very highly correlated to $ETH. Hence as long as $ETH is not moving (and it seems to have lost its momentum and relative strength again) $Link will not move much either. Unfortunately"
X Link 2024-01-27T00:47Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@DefiWimar Not happening bro. There is currently [--] need a clear statement from $coin and a very hostile regulatory environment for $coin. If theres ever going to be a token you will have plenty of time to recycle and repost this thread 20-50 times before that 😉"
X Link 2024-01-30T00:44Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@ctzoki Thats not a bad take to this issue.I still wonder which token within the Cosmos ecosystem will capture the value that is undoubtedly created there. My bet is still not on $atom Why is DOT val 2x higher than ATOM val despite the fact Cosmos ecosystem is currently much more active than Polkadot ecosystem Polkadot by design managed to make DOT into a Schelling point asset for the whole ecosystem while ATOM failed in that regard there are many Why is DOT val 2x higher than ATOM val despite the fact Cosmos ecosystem is currently much more active than Polkadot ecosystem Polkadot by design"
X Link 2024-01-31T07:36Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@MaransCrypto Seems like a distraction to deter some Sybils. No serious project will really rely on crap like Gitcoin Galxe etc. All of these projects go against the ethos of #Web3 by connecting #Web2 data with financial (Web3) data and hence putting their users in the crosshairs of scammers"
X Link 2024-01-31T07:47Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@ctzoki Yeah - not doubting that $Atom has value for the user. Just sayin that it could be much much more relevant if there was a way for it to capture the value that is created in the Cosmos ecosystem. $Atom would be a top [--] coin in this case"
X Link 2024-01-31T09:30Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@MooseCryptos 50% chance that it will break out to the downside. $BTC already on the way to work its magic for that. So you might reconsider your statement that it wont come back 😉"
X Link 2024-01-31T13:12Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@KD7884 @CryptoItza @Yogi13031997 My hunch is its exactly that. Regular airdrop to normal users who could not care less about nonsense like Galxe layer3 or an even more nonsensical NFT that attests you sth thats completely on-chain and basically a flag for a Sybil wallet (who else would care about # of Txs)"
X Link 2024-01-31T23:24Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@LinkWarLord Everybody can see that #chainlink creates a ton of value and has a wide span of products. The point you mention and - much more important - velocity of $Link circulation will determine if $Link is worth [--] USD or [---] USD. So this is the most important discussion to have here"
X Link 2024-02-04T11:24Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@0xFastLife Last $tia requirement was like [--] $tia for $Alt and Id guess this number will increase even more. So if you stake $dym Id recommend at least [---] (equivalent to around [--] $tia). Better [---] or even more if you can afford it"
X Link 2024-02-07T12:52Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@wacy_time1 Where do they get these extra EigenLayer points from Is EigenLayer diluting themselves here"
X Link 2024-02-09T08:54Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@WynpasNFT @EatHealthyGetR1 @73lV_ No [---] $Tia were also [---] $Dym"
X Link 2024-02-10T10:29Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@alex_valaitis What would be your key players in the RWA space if I may ask"
X Link 2024-02-11T10:28Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@twPunkgod True - they are extracting a lot of value. But I am pretty sure there are quite effective ways to combat them (some of them even mint NFTs labelled xxx airdrop hunter 🤣). Teams reacting with using utter nonsense like Galxe Gitcoin passport etc however also not the right way"
X Link 2024-02-12T12:31Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@arndxt_xo @Entanglefi Since you are like the 54th influencer promoting this the same way I have a feeling that there marketing department is much much much stronger than the product side 😉. Seems like a pure influencer play at this stage and gives $azero vibes"
X Link 2024-02-12T12:34Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@DeFiVoyager_X The problem in #crypto is that greed trumps brains. So people fall for points that have a) [--] value and b) no fixed exchange rate to a specific token. = projects are incentivised to screw their users and end up themselves in a rat race against other points-related projects"
X Link 2024-02-12T16:28Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@luckychartape Same here - cant see a future where $BTC is not the oszillating (and range-bound) asset that we all know. At the top everybody is forced to sell (if not others will put you at a disadvantage by selling) and at the bottom everybody tries to buy. No reason why an ETF changes that"
X Link 2024-02-12T22:11Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@SameDayTrades Dude - you could probably check how much money banks transact with and how this compares to their valuation. And they are extracting much much more money than $Link does. Brings you down to earth and makes you erase a couple of 0s from your valuation target"
X Link 2024-02-13T19:31Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@Joshyysmartt Yeah - imagine you have followed their advice and converted your $ETH to $rETH or $stETH etc. So you technically have that $ETH but its not valid 🤯"
X Link 2024-02-14T09:56Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@DannyMayes @Crypto_BitC They just dont know better. Getting $Link tokens is a hassle for non-crypto people. And Grayscale-Link goes up the same way as the regular $Link token - just on a different level. So it serves their purpose the same way as the real $Link"
X Link 2024-02-14T21:44Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@iamDCinvestor In my opinion it depends heavily what happens to staking yields. Are they part of the ETF - so people getting ETH exposure + staking yield or not. If they get the yield = this is the real deal and flows will even surpass $BTC ETFs. However its hard to implement afaik"
X Link 2024-02-14T23:06Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@Route2FI Remind me again why you think that current holders of $BTC or buyers of the $BTC via an ETF cant take profits and sell their respective $BTC within lets say a couple of minutes Similar to $GBTC last cycle (first premium then discount) - this can easily turn and haunt us"
X Link 2024-02-15T09:26Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@nullpackets Im not sure if one can argue like that. Have a look at $Matic for instance. Theyve basically (copied) every product any project in #crypto ever offered. $Frax is also a potpourri of different products. So you could also argue in the opposite direction: Lack of focus"
X Link 2024-02-15T23:14Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@enjoywithouthey Thats a funny post. Cant be serious though and clearly engagement farming"
X Link 2024-02-16T10:03Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@enjoywithouthey Yeah - it is clear that there is sth brewing here. And $Stx gets attention from institutions now too. Still think that $ETH is far too progressed and important and that it will get an ETF pretty soon because since $BTC got one there is basically no reason left to deny it"
X Link 2024-02-16T10:18Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@CryptoDavid_ Additionally it does not matter at all that there is such a big discrepancy in price. $Glink serves its purpose and is directionally going up and down when $Link does. So there is no need for Trad-Fi people to actually buy $Link or for $Link and $Glink to converge in price"
X Link 2024-02-16T15:45Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@crypthoem AirDrop points you should be tracking in 2024: - Points are a tool for projects to screw over users. a) no guarantee for a token and b) if so = no fixed exchange rate between points and token. = projects can do any nonsense (2x points for this 3x for that) or delay for ages"
X Link 2024-02-18T14:10Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@stacy_muur @eigenlayer Why would you assume a linear relationship between points and the token A tiered approach is probably more likely - even $Alt who airdropped to Eigenlayer stakers used such an approach"
X Link 2024-02-19T09:34Z [---] followers, [----] engagements

"@Rancune_eth Humans are greedy. Retail will come - just not yet. Its way too early for the masses - timewise (we are early this cycle in terms of halving etc) and pricewise (mainstream media basically not reporting yet about #crypto except for $BTC etf which is not geared towards retail)"
X Link 2024-02-19T10:28Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@samoa_joes @stacy_muur @eigenlayer Not sure - a non-tiered approach would lead to centralisation tendencies in Eigenlayer and nobody really wants this. Neither Eigenlayer itself nor the $ETH community that already has such a problem with $Lido"
X Link 2024-02-19T15:02Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@samoa_joes @stacy_muur @eigenlayer The ones controlling $Eigen are the ones controlling governance and the future of it. $Eigen has a lot of locked $ETH and governance decides what and what not to do with it. If $Eigen for instance blows up - the whole $ETH community and probably all of #crypto will be affected"
X Link 2024-02-19T15:07Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@samoa_joes @stacy_muur @eigenlayer To be fair we both dont and cant really know. I can see your point too. Lets wait and see what happens and how they will proceed"
X Link 2024-02-19T15:13Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@samoa_joes @stacy_muur @eigenlayer Thats a good point to our discussion by the way. It stems from Scroll - who are thinking about their airdrop currently and have a big Sybil problem. The first sentence is quite interesting The goal of the airdrop should be to distribute the protocol "ownership" (either in form of staking governance or both) to as many people/entities aligned with your project as possible. Maximizing the complexity of the criteria in order to achieve the previously stated goal The goal of the airdrop should be to distribute the protocol "ownership" (either in form of staking"
X Link 2024-02-19T15:17Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@2021Shuperman @CryptoKoryo Some of what you call humanity scoring tools and especially stuff like Galxe layer3 Gitcoin PP etc combine personal data (Web2) with financial data (Web3). This is a very dangerous path as it basically prints targets on the back of the users. This should not be the way"
X Link 2024-02-20T09:01Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@FrauBelz Its not as bad as it looks. You have about [--] days time so you can just use a low fee for your claim and let the Tx wait in the mempool until fees are lower and your Tx gets included in a block"
X Link 2024-02-20T10:17Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@iamDCinvestor Pretty easy. Some of these people have laser eyes in their PP even more of them have the ticker $BTC in their bio and pretty much all of them are voicing strong opinions about $ETH and other subjects without doing research or having proper knowledge. Latest example: @dotkrueger"
X Link 2024-02-22T07:08Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@deep96s @AvailProject Please dont use sth like Gitcoin passport. There have to be better ways than using a tool that goes against the ethos of #Web3 by combining personal Web2 data with financial #Web3 data and therefore putting targets at the back of the users"
X Link 2024-02-23T08:21Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@UniStake @MoregainJP @info_insightful @zksync Lots of these airdrop guides are just utter nonsense engagement farming or shilling ref-links. Makes [--] sense to use zksync lite for instance right now (or during the last year): There is nothing to do there anymore. Same with multisig accounts: There is [--] opportunity for them"
X Link 2024-02-24T20:34Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@CryptoKoryo You already earn rewards if you stake $GMX. That explains it for them at least. https://tokenomicshub.xyz/gmx https://tokenomicshub.xyz/gmx"
X Link 2024-02-26T12:46Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@CarpeNoctom Does this mean @biancoresearch is right that there is a lot of trading/gambling going on The difference between volume and net inflows would leave me with this impression It's official.the New Nine Bitcoin ETFs have broken all time volume record today with $2.4b just barely beating Day One but about double their recent daily average. $IBIT went wild accounting for $1.3b of it breaking its record by about 30%. https://t.co/MiCs1rzttM It's official.the New Nine Bitcoin ETFs have broken all time volume record today with $2.4b just barely beating Day One but about double their recent"
X Link 2024-02-27T06:16Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@NFTLunatic @AlphaSeeker21 If somebody were to give a serious reply here it would probably say sth like $NVDA has a business a working business model and is raking in a ton of money every single day while the others dont. But who would want to have a serious debate about that 😉"
X Link 2024-02-27T06:20Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@Chching_ Definitely nothing - like 100% certainty. Completely irrelevant. Boomers trading this at very low volume and it does not matter for a second that it is detached from $Link because it is directionally right and that is all what matters"
X Link 2024-02-28T11:01Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@CryptoKoryo Slowly - Coinbase App down even though they were prepared: - $Doge up almost 20% - Coinbase App jumps [---] places in App Store ranking and breaks into Top [---] Apps are now recovering. We had modeled a 10x surge in traffic and load tested it. This exceeded that number. It's expensive to keep services over-provisioned but we'll need to keep working on auto-scaling solutions and killing any remaining bottlenecks. Thank you for Apps are now recovering. We had modeled a 10x surge in traffic and load tested it. This exceeded that number. It's expensive to keep services over-provisioned"
X Link 2024-02-28T22:43Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@CryptoKoryo Lets see. Everything seems to be much quicker this time: $BTC very early to new ATHs retail basically back and in masses much sooner than expected. And I am still not sure who buys the ETFs. Trading volumes very high in comparison to Net Inflows. Might be Degens who buy it"
X Link 2024-02-28T22:48Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@DefiDrew Why would you assume that there is a second wave after the first blowoff top. Everybody who wanted to get involved with #crypto had the chance by then. So isnt a normal or maybe even prolonged (as @CredibleCrypto and @BobLoukas argue) bear after that a much more likely scenario"
X Link 2024-02-29T06:12Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@KenHuys @chainlink @Google I dont even understand that argument. Why would searches for $Link go up Its not geared towards retail and its certainly not a token retail typically buys. Too big for most price of a single unit [--] USD freakishly complex in terms of what they do in contrast to others"
X Link 2024-02-29T06:46Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@tedtalksmacro Any explanation why trading volume is 10x of that Does that mean that @biancoresearch is right in his assumption that mainly Degens/Traders buy the $BTC ETFs or is their a better alternative explanation"
X Link 2024-02-29T06:52Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@linkminx What 😀 Nobody cares about $Glink. Its 100% irrelevant. Trading Volume very low only a specific group uses it and it does not matter at all that it is detached from $Link price or if it is 1:1. Its directionally right and that is all that it needs to do and why its there"
X Link 2024-02-29T09:53Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@ChainLinkGod Dont the the relevance. $Glink basically completely detached from $Link: Low volume other participants trading it on different rails etc. And $Glink is directionally right so that it fulfills its purpose perfectly for the traders there"
X Link 2024-02-29T16:38Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@tedtalksmacro @JSeyff Trading volumes of the ETFs seem to be quite high compared to net inflows (10:1 or even higher). Is this already a good indicator that @biancoresearch is right with his thesis that degens might be the (majority) buyers Implications of this for the next bear are v. important imo"
X Link 2024-02-29T22:55Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@Chching_ I am not sure if not wanting to open up a $Coin account is it: There is simply no need to do that since $Glink does the same because it is directionally behaving the same way as $Link. You might have a point in regards to opportunity. On the other hand $Glink just not relevant"
X Link 2024-03-01T00:37Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@Wahndo_ You are aware that $Glink the product that is detached from $Link which does not matter at all because $Glink does what its supposed to do (being directionally right) is a Grayscale product. Thats it. Grayscale wont do more for $Link because flows for $Glink are very low"
X Link 2024-03-01T14:00Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@trueLinkMarine @chainlink subject to final testing - they always sneak sth like that in which could mean a lot of delay. 😀 But as I said a lot of ads from them on my timeline and Sergey going public probably means that it actually is about to happen"
X Link 2024-03-01T14:53Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@apeyieldgod There is actually a decent chance that this will basically not change during the whole bull market. Not fudding $Link just thinking that meme-coins might play a different role than last time. Meme coins pumping during $BTC season already an indicator for that"
X Link 2024-03-04T23:01Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"1/ 🧵 Unpacking the #crypto money flow: Typically it's Fiat ➡ BTC ➡ Large Cap Altcoins ➡ Small Cap Altcoins. But what if there's an alternative hypothesis Let's challenge the status quo and explore how this cycle might be different. #Bitcoin #Altcoins #MemeCoins"
X Link 2024-03-05T09:45Z [---] followers, [----] engagements

"2/ 🔄 Meme-coins traditionally sit outside the classic #crypto flow operating in their own unique orbit. But what if we're at the cusp of a fundamental shift A transformation within the meme-coin realm that could ripple across the entire crypto ecosystem. #MemeCoins"
X Link 2024-03-05T09:45Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"6/ 🎯 Today's meme-coin landscape is a smorgasbord catering to every flavor of investor sentiment. Whether you're in for the memes the community or speculative gains there's a meme-coin out there for you"
X Link 2024-03-05T09:45Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"7/ 🔄 From dog-themed coins to cat-themed ones from serious to the downright silly the variety is staggering. This diversity means investors can find a meme-coin that aligns with their interests risk tolerance and investment philosophy"
X Link 2024-03-05T09:45Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"11/ 🌟 With their established presence variety and resilience meme-coins now provide everything retail investors seek: the thrill of discovery community engagement and the potential for gains all within a more navigable space. #RetailCrypto #MemeCoinMagic"
X Link 2024-03-05T09:45Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"12/ 🚀 For retail investors the meme-coin sector has become a self-sufficient universe. It offers all the excitement and trading dynamics of an altcoin season without the complexity and opacity that now characterizes the broader altcoin market. #CryptoTrends #InvestorShift"
X Link 2024-03-05T09:45Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@trueLinkMarine Well that meme-coins would be relevant was pretty obvious. Problem with them is just that you dont know which ones beforehand. However that $Link is again heavily underperforming basically anything else for a second cycle in a row is very disappointing"
X Link 2024-03-08T19:24Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@FaithfulFortitu @trueLinkMarine Depends how you count it. $Link was (together with $BNB) the only relevant token to outperform $BTC during the bear. So people expected strength. During the actual bull market the performance was very very disappointing for most then. Basically all sorts of crap outperformed it"
X Link 2024-03-09T13:56Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@FaithfulFortitu @trueLinkMarine To your second point. $Link is magnitudes smaller than $BTC or $ETH. Just doing the same as them in terms of performance is very weak. Why would you hold the smaller and more volatile $Link if it does not outperform the [--] majors Additionally basically all other projects with"
X Link 2024-03-09T13:57Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@FaithfulFortitu @trueLinkMarine even half decent fundamentals have $Link outperformed massively so far: $Sol $Near $Avax $Near etc. And in a bull market winners tend to continue to run = the gap will be wider and wider. We are in desperate need of some catalyst for $Link right now to get it off the ground"
X Link 2024-03-09T13:59Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@ChainlinkNFTHub Should not confuse fundamental utility of @chainlink with value accrual for the $Link token. The first one is getting clearer every day. The second one - still not the slightest idea if the value created by @chainlink will translate into a higher $Link token price"
X Link 2024-03-09T14:05Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@ChainlinkNFTHub @chainlink Yeah I have seen that 👍. All of this is just quite far away and based on a number of hypothesis. And its not clear as of now if it is playing out like this. To just give you an example: If $Sol or some other monolithic chain actually wins there is not much need for #CCIP"
X Link 2024-03-09T14:28Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@ChainlinkNFTHub @chainlink Yeah - but oracles and oracle data is basically a commodity = not much value accrual possible there. If the monolithic thesis plays out and $Sol becomes more dominant it might be even worse for $Link because @jump is powerful there and they are supporting $Pyth"
X Link 2024-03-09T14:51Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@hereandthere007 Dont believe in this conspiracy theory that somebody is controlling it or whatever not even a second. You are confusing utility @chainlink labs provides with the $Link token. If and how $Link is accruing this value is a completely open question at this stage. Continued"
X Link 2024-03-10T01:23Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@hereandthere007 @chainlink Right now there are basically [--] incentives to hold $Link. Staking is only available for not even 10% of circulating supply and node operators have no reason or incentive to hold = they are probably selling most of their $Link (similar to $BTC miners even though Continued"
X Link 2024-03-10T01:25Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@hereandthere007 @chainlink they would not have to because its not a business with large investments etc. But there is simply no reason for them to hold on to their $Link. And if they are not holding on to it token velocity for $Link is high which means value accrual is very hard to impossible right now"
X Link 2024-03-10T01:27Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@QuintenFrancois Dont think it works that way. a) you are confusing utility @chainlink provides with the $Link token = fundamentals dont have to accrue on the token level b) the more frustrated people are the more of them will use a price appreciation to get out = its capped to the upside"
X Link 2024-03-10T01:50Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@blknoiz06 Thank you for giving us a great indicator for when the #crypto party will be over. Probably cant get more insane and resembles the Super Bowl crypto ads at almost the perfect top of last cycle"
X Link 2024-03-10T11:15Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@osf_rekt Hopefully not. Wed have to sell everything then because the punishment (the dump following) will be brutal. Thought its still quite early - yet people already wanna ruin the party by replicating the Super Bowl commercial nonsense from last cycle top"
X Link 2024-03-10T11:49Z [---] followers, [--] engagements

"@KenHuys @chainlink My hunch would be that the people that will experience this are not born yet. It did not even move for [--] USDs yesterday and is again stalling and retracing 🤯. Meanwhile even outright nonsense like $XRP does a casual 20%"
X Link 2024-03-11T23:47Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@KenHuys @chainlink Will do that. Its my third cycle with $Link and Im really getting tired & annoyed. Basically every crap token has outperformed it since [----]. Imo this poor performance cant and wont change any time soon. Tokenomics just bad up until NOs get a strong incentive to hold"
X Link 2024-03-11T23:53Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@KenHuys @chainlink The market is doing fine and pricing it correctly. Thats the problem. Right now $Link has positioned itself as a utility token and as a solution as important as $BTC and $ETH (see their last post). Ok if you do that the market will assess you accordingly. Thats why a"
X Link 2024-03-12T00:02Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

"@KenHuys @chainlink comparison with $Doge etc is nonsense. $Doge is sth else never pretended to have utility and is therefore assessed differently. Ok so $Link in the camp of a utility token. Great so what you need now some utility that you create. ✅ in this category as it is the superior"
X Link 2024-03-12T00:05Z [---] followers, [---] engagements

Limited data mode. Full metrics available with subscription: lunarcrush.com/pricing