[GUEST ACCESS MODE: Data is scrambled or limited to provide examples. Make requests using your API key to unlock full data. Check https://lunarcrush.ai/auth for authentication information.]
@AlgoMattie Aftershock.algoAftershock.algo posts on X about telcoin, made in, long term, algo the most. They currently have XXX followers and X posts still getting attention that total XX engagements in the last XX hours.
Social category influence cryptocurrencies XXXXX% stocks XXXXX% countries XXXXX%
Social topic influence telcoin 14.29%, made in 14.29%, long term 14.29%, algo 14.29%, holders XXXXX%
Top accounts mentioned or mentioned by @algofoundation @mochanerd @algofamily @nfdomains @mercurystriker @adriencryptoz @pronodealgo @octgems @ondofinance @kaspaunchained @rendernetwork @telcoin @zebechq @kadenaio @paalmind @marcvl
Top assets mentioned Telcoin (TEL)
Top posts by engagements in the last XX hours
"@oct_gems @OndoFinance @kaspaunchained @rendernetwork @telcoin @Zebec_HQ @kadena_io @PaalMind I'll never take one of these lists that doesn't include #algorand seriously. Made in America carbon negative sub X sec block time instant finality quantum resistant zero downtime partnership with googles AP2 effort are you kidding me"
X Link @AlgoMattie 2025-10-22T03:29Z XXX followers, XXX engagements
"Love you @marcvl but isn't that semantics The foundation made a deal siphoning rewards away from node runners (who are generally exhausted long term #algorand holders) and passing those rewards to World chess. The foundation removed themselves as the middlemen but what's the argument that funding that deal rather through a payment from the sales of algo or siphoning rewards is not a foundation venture My take is that at best is a bad faith argument. I've been in Algorand since March of '21 and have supported the foundation but the above take is nonsense. Note it's not an argument against"
X Link @AlgoMattie 2025-10-22T19:15Z XXX followers, XXX engagements